The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnetic resonance imaging-based brain tumor grades classification and grading via convolutional neural networks and genetic algorithms
Abstract
Abstract Gliomas are the most common type of primary brain tumors in adults and their early detection is of great importance. In this paper, a method based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and genetic algorithm (GA) is proposed in order to noninvasively classify different grades of Glioma using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the proposed method, the architecture (structure) of the CNN is evolved using GA, unlike existing methods of selecting a deep neural network architecture which are usually based on trial and error or by adopting predefined common structures. Furthermore, to decrease the variance of prediction error, bagging as an ensemble algorithm is utilized on the best model evolved by the GA. To briefly mention the results, in one case study, 90.9 percent accuracy for classifying three Glioma grades was obtained. In another case study, Glioma, Meningioma, and Pituitary tumor types were classified with 94.2 percent accuracy. The results reveal the effectiveness of the proposed method in classifying brain tumor via MRI images. Due to the flexible nature of the method, it can be readily used in practice for assisting the doctor to diagnose brain tumors in an early stage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., van Ginneken, B., & Sánchez, C. I. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 · Cited by 15,332
Ensemble methods in machine learning
Dietterich, T. G. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45014-9_1 · Cited by 8,408
ADADELTA: An Adaptive Learning Rate Method
Zeiler, M. D. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1212.5701 · Cited by 5,322
The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository
Clark, K., Vendt, B., Smith, K., Freymann, J., Kirby, J., Koppel, P., Moore, S., Phillips, S., Maffitt, D., Pringle, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Digital Imaging · doi:10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7 · Cited by 4,599
Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)
Clevert, D.-A., Unterthiner, T., & Hochreiter, S. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.07289 · Cited by 4,513
Brain tumor segmentation with Deep Neural Networks
Havaei, M., Davy, A., Warde-Farley, D., Biard, A., Courville, A., Bengio, Y., Pal, C., Jodoin, P.-M., & Larochelle, H. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.05.004 · Cited by 3,278
Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Convolutional Neural Networks in MRI Images
Pereira, S., Pinto, A., Alves, V., & Silva, C. A. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2538465 · Cited by 2,735
Cited by
Multi-Classification of Brain Tumor Images Using Deep Neural Network
Sultan, H. H., Salem, N. M., & Al-Atabany, W. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2919122 · Cited by 775
A Deep Learning Model Based on Concatenation Approach for the Diagnosis of Brain Tumor
Noreen, N., Palaniappan, S., Qayyum, A., Ahmad, I., Imran, M., & Shoaib, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2978629 · Cited by 478
Deep CNN for Brain Tumor Classification
Ayadi, W., Elhamzi, W., Charfi, I., & Atri, M. (2021) · Neural Processing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11063-020-10398-2 · Cited by 448
Tiwari, A., Srivastava, S., & Pant, M. (2020) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2019.11.020 · Cited by 361
Siva Raja, P. M., & rani, A. V. (2020) · Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2020.01.006 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Kabir Anaraki, A., Ayati, M., & Kazemi, F.
- Venue
- Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-74
- ISSN
- 0208-5216 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2897188827
- Cited by
- 611
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 13.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetic resonance imaging-based brain tumor grades classification and grading via convolutional neural networks and genetic algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bbe.2018.10.004
- The paper
- Kabir Anaraki, A., Ayati, M., & Kazemi, F. (2019). Magnetic resonance imaging-based brain tumor grades classification and grading via convolutional neural networks and genetic algorithms. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2018.10.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
