Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 125 of the 125 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A comparative analysis of signal processing and classification methods for different applications based on EEG signals

Khosla, Ashima, Khandnor, Padmavati, Chand, Trilok·2020·Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Abstract Electroencephalogram (EEG) measures the neuronal activities in the form of electric currents that are generated due to the synchronized activity by a group of specialized pyramidal cells inside the brain. The study presents a brief comparison of various functional neuroimaging techniques, revealing the excellent neuroimaging capabilities of EEG signals such as high temporal resolution, inexpensiveness, portability, and non-invasiveness as compared to the other techniques such as positron emission tomography, magnetoencephalogram, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and transcranial magnetic stimulation. Different types of frequency bands associated with the brain signals are also being summarized. The main purpose of this literature survey is to cover the maximum possible applications of EEG signals based on computer-aided technologies, ranging from the diagnosis of various neurological disorders such as epilepsy, major depressive disorder, alcohol use disorder, and dementia to the monitoring of other applications such as motor imagery, identity authentication, emotion recognition, sleep stage classification, eye state detection, and drowsiness monitoring. After reviewing them, the comparative analysis of the publicly available EEG datasets and other local data acquisition methods, preprocessing techniques, feature extraction methods, and the result analysis through the classification models and statistical tests has been presented. Then the research gaps and future directions in the present studies have been summarized with the aim to inspire the readers to explore more opportunities on the current topic. Finally, the survey has been completed with the brief description about the studies exploring the fusion of brain signals from multiple modalities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbe.2020.02.002

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 125 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Khosla, A., Khandnor, P., & Chand, T.
Venue
Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
649-690
ISSN
0208-5216 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3007593444
Cited by
267
References
125
FWCI
16.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparative analysis of signal processing and classification methods for different applications based on EEG signals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bbe.2020.02.002
The paper
Khosla, A., Khandnor, P., & Chand, T. (2020). A comparative analysis of signal processing and classification methods for different applications based on EEG signals. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2020.02.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.