Cited by 161Stress Responses and CortisolCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune ResponseImmune responses and vaccinations

Acute stress exposure prior to influenza vaccination enhances antibody response in women

Edwards, Kate M., Burns, Victoria E., Reynolds, Tracy, Carroll, Douglas, Drayson, Mark, Ring, Christopher·2006·Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Abstract

Animal studies have shown that an acute stressor in close temporal proximity to immune challenge can enhance the response to delayed-type hypersensitivity and antibody response to vaccination. The current study examined the effects of acute exercise or mental stress prior to influenza vaccination on the subsequent antibody response to each of the three viral strains. Sixty young healthy adults (31 men, 29 women) were randomly allocated to one of three task conditions: dynamic exercise, mental stress, or control. After an initial baseline, participants completed their allocated 45 min task and then received the influenza vaccine. Plasma cortisol and interleukin-6 were determined at the end of baseline, after the task, and after 60 min recovery. Antibody titres were measured pre-vaccination and at 4 weeks and 20 weeks post-vaccination follow-ups. For the A/Panama strain, women in both the exercise and mental stress conditions showed higher antibody titres at both 4 and 20 weeks than those in the control condition, while men responded similarly in all conditions. Interleukin-6 at +60 min recovery was found to be a significant predictor of subsequent A/Panama antibody response in women. In line with animal research, the current study provides preliminary evidence that acute stress can enhance the antibody response to vaccination in humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2005.07.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 53 · Cited by 161

Authors
Edwards, K. M., Burns, V. E., Reynolds, T., Carroll, D., Drayson, M., & Ring, C.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Edwards, Kate M.
Venue
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
159-168
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968939469
Cited by
161
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
Keywords
acute stress, influenza vaccination, antibody response, physical activity, psychological stress, sex differences, interleukin-6, cortisol, vaccine immunogenicity
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Antibody Formation, Physical Exertion, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Influenza Vaccines, Male, Influenza A virus, Influenza B virus, Reference Values, Sex Factors, Stress, Physiological, Interleukin-6

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review