Acute stress exposure prior to influenza vaccination enhances antibody response in women
Abstract
Animal studies have shown that an acute stressor in close temporal proximity to immune challenge can enhance the response to delayed-type hypersensitivity and antibody response to vaccination. The current study examined the effects of acute exercise or mental stress prior to influenza vaccination on the subsequent antibody response to each of the three viral strains. Sixty young healthy adults (31 men, 29 women) were randomly allocated to one of three task conditions: dynamic exercise, mental stress, or control. After an initial baseline, participants completed their allocated 45 min task and then received the influenza vaccine. Plasma cortisol and interleukin-6 were determined at the end of baseline, after the task, and after 60 min recovery. Antibody titres were measured pre-vaccination and at 4 weeks and 20 weeks post-vaccination follow-ups. For the A/Panama strain, women in both the exercise and mental stress conditions showed higher antibody titres at both 4 and 20 weeks than those in the control condition, while men responded similarly in all conditions. Interleukin-6 at +60 min recovery was found to be a significant predictor of subsequent A/Panama antibody response in women. In line with animal research, the current study provides preliminary evidence that acute stress can enhance the antibody response to vaccination in humans.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Acute stress enhances antiviral defenses.
“For example, whereas acute stress has been found to enhance antiviral defenses”
From From stress to inflammation and major depressive disorder: A social signal transduction theory of depression. (2014) · cites this paper as Edwards et al., 2006
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 53 · Cited by 161
- Authors
- Edwards, K. M., Burns, V. E., Reynolds, T., Carroll, D., Drayson, M., & Ring, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Edwards, Kate M.
- Venue
- Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-168
- ISSN
- 0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968939469
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 2.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
- Keywords
- acute stress, influenza vaccination, antibody response, physical activity, psychological stress, sex differences, interleukin-6, cortisol, vaccine immunogenicity
- MeSH terms
- Acute Disease, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Antibody Formation, Physical Exertion, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Influenza Vaccines, Male, Influenza A virus, Influenza B virus, Reference Values, Sex Factors, Stress, Physiological, Interleukin-6
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review