Comparing Type D personality and older age as correlates of tumor necrosis factor-α dysregulation in chronic heart failure
Abstract
Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and its soluble receptors 1 (sTNFR1) and 2 (sTNFR2) have been shown to be implicated in the pathogenesis of chronic heart failure (CHF). Ageing is accompanied by increased plasma levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. We hypothesized that Type D personality (joint tendency to experience negative emotions and to inhibit self-expression) and age may have similar pro-inflammatory effects in the context of CHF. Participants in this study were 130 consecutive outpatients with CHF (76% men); there were 70 relatively younger (<or=59 years) and 60 relatively older (>or=60 years) patients. They all completed the 14-item Type D Scale (DS14); 43 patients (33%) had a Type D personality. A multivariate model of cytokine levels indicated an independent overall effect of both older age [F(1,128)=9.11, p=.003] and Type D personality [F(1,128)=8.28, p=.005]. Stratifying patients in age/personality subgroups showed that younger non-Type D patients had the lowest and older Type D patients the highest sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 levels (986+/-318 vs 1661+/-1128 pg/ml and 1838+/-777 vs 2823+/-1439 pg/ml, p<.0001). Importantly, the mean sTNFR1 level in younger Type D patients (1359+/-660 pg/ml) was equivalent to that in older non-Type D patients (1360+/-440 pg/ml, p=.99) who were on average 18 years older. Younger Type D and older non-Type D patients also had similar sTNFR2 levels (2406+/-1329 vs 2448+/-812 pg/ml, p=.88). Only older Type D patients had a higher mean TNF-alpha level as compared to patients who were younger or who were not Type D (5.4+/-2.9 vs 3.9+/-2.4 pg/ml, p=.008). A logistic regression model including sex, severity of CHF, systolic heart failure and ischemic etiology indicated that the combined risk category of older age or Type D was independently associated with substantially increased sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 levels. Hence, Type D personality was associated with increased TNF-alpha activity. This disease-promoting effect of Type D matched the pro-inflammatory effect of ageing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 58
- Authors
- Denollet, J., Vrints, C. J., & Conraads, V. M.
- Affiliations
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Antwerp University Hospital (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Denollet, Johan
- Venue
- Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 736-743
- ISSN
- 0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018847505
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- Type D personality, chronic heart failure, TNF-α, soluble TNF receptors, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 2, aging, inflammatory cytokines, inflammation, risk factors, ischemic heart failure, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, sex differences, comorbidities, anxiety, social isolation, loneliness, social support, physical activity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Chronic Disease, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Personality Assessment, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Cytokines, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type II
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review