Psychological stress and antibody response to influenza vaccination: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Vaccination is an important public health strategy for reducing the risk of influenza at the societal level. However, at the individual level, not everyone is protected by vaccination, and increases in antibody titers may fail to reach protective levels. Several recent studies suggest that psychological stress may contribute to these individual differences. Exploring this hypothesis, we conducted a meta-analysis of 13 studies examining the influence of psychological stress on antibody responses following influenza vaccination. The studies were identified through systematic searches in MEDLINE and PsychINFO and included a total of 1158 men and women. In five studies, the increased antibody levels of caregivers following vaccination were compared to those of non-caregivers. The remaining studies focused on associations between self-reported stressful life events or perceived stress and increased antibody titers following vaccination. The meta-analysis revealed a significant negative association between psychological stress and antibody responses to influenza vaccination. While effect sizes were similar across different indicators of stress, antibody responses to the A/H1N1 and B-influenza types appeared to be more sensitive to stress than the A/H3N2 type. It was investigated whether the association between stress and antibody response differed between young and elderly, and the results revealed significant negative associations between stress and peak antibody titers in both ag…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prolonged stress and depression are associated with reduced antiviral immune responses.
“prolonged stress and depression have been associated with reduced antiviral immune responses”
From From stress to inflammation and major depressive disorder: A social signal transduction theory of depression. (2014) · cites this paper as Pedersen, Zachariae, & Bovbjerg, 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 133
- Authors
- Pedersen, A. F., Zachariae, R., & Bovbjerg, D. H.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pedersen, Anette Fischer
- Venue
- Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 427-433
- ISSN
- 0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073553646
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
- Keywords
- psychological stress, influenza vaccination, antibody response, vaccine-induced immunity, perceived stress, life events, caregivers, H1N1 influenza, H3N2, age differences, vaccine response variability
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Antibody Formation, Female, Humans, Influenza, Human, Influenza Vaccines, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Vaccination, Alphainfluenzavirus, Betainfluenzavirus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review