Cited by 133Influenza Virus Research StudiesStress Responses and CortisolImmune responses and vaccinations

Psychological stress and antibody response to influenza vaccination: A meta-analysis

Pedersen, Anette Fischer, Zachariae, Robert, Bovbjerg, Dana Howard·2009·Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Abstract

Vaccination is an important public health strategy for reducing the risk of influenza at the societal level. However, at the individual level, not everyone is protected by vaccination, and increases in antibody titers may fail to reach protective levels. Several recent studies suggest that psychological stress may contribute to these individual differences. Exploring this hypothesis, we conducted a meta-analysis of 13 studies examining the influence of psychological stress on antibody responses following influenza vaccination. The studies were identified through systematic searches in MEDLINE and PsychINFO and included a total of 1158 men and women. In five studies, the increased antibody levels of caregivers following vaccination were compared to those of non-caregivers. The remaining studies focused on associations between self-reported stressful life events or perceived stress and increased antibody titers following vaccination. The meta-analysis revealed a significant negative association between psychological stress and antibody responses to influenza vaccination. While effect sizes were similar across different indicators of stress, antibody responses to the A/H1N1 and B-influenza types appeared to be more sensitive to stress than the A/H3N2 type. It was investigated whether the association between stress and antibody response differed between young and elderly, and the results revealed significant negative associations between stress and peak antibody titers in both ag…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2009.01.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 133

Authors
Pedersen, A. F., Zachariae, R., & Bovbjerg, D. H.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Pedersen, Anette Fischer
Venue
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
427-433
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073553646
Cited by
133
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
Keywords
psychological stress, influenza vaccination, antibody response, vaccine-induced immunity, perceived stress, life events, caregivers, H1N1 influenza, H3N2, age differences, vaccine response variability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Antibody Formation, Female, Humans, Influenza, Human, Influenza Vaccines, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Vaccination, Alphainfluenzavirus, Betainfluenzavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review