Cited by 63Child Abuse and TraumaStress Responses and CortisolPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Associations of childhood adversity and adulthood trauma with C-reactive protein: A cross-sectional population-based study

Open access
Lin, Joy E., Neylan, Thomas C., Epel, Elissa, O’Donovan, Aoife·2016·Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Abstract

Mounting evidence highlights specific forms of psychological stress as risk factors for ill health. Particularly strong evidence indicates that childhood adversity and adulthood trauma exposure increase risk for physical and psychiatric disorders, and there is emerging evidence that inflammation may play a key role in these relationships. In a population-based sample from the Health and Retirement Study (n=11,198, mean age 69 ± 10), we examine whether childhood adversity, adulthood trauma, and the interaction between them are associated with elevated levels of the systemic inflammatory marker high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). All models were adjusted for age, gender, race, education, and year of data collection, as well as other possible confounds in follow-up sensitivity analyses. In our sample, 67% of individuals had experienced at least one traumatic event during adulthood, and those with childhood adversity were almost three times as likely to have experienced trauma as an adult. Childhood adversities and adulthood traumas were independently associated with elevated levels of hsCRP (β=0.03, p=0.01 and β=0.05, p<0.001, respectively). Those who had experienced both types of stress had higher levels of hsCRP than those with adulthood trauma alone, Estimate=-0.06, 95% CI [-0.003, -0.12], p=0.04, but not compared to those with childhood adversity alone, Estimate=-0.06, 95% CI [0.03, -0.16], p=0.19. There was no interaction between childhood and adulthood trauma exposure. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine adulthood trauma exposure and inflammation in a large population-based sample, and the first to explore the interaction of childhood adversity and adulthood trauma with inflammation. Our study demonstrates the prevalence of trauma-related inflammation in the general population and suggests that childhood adversity and adulthood trauma are independently associated with elevated inflammation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.11.015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals exposed to childhood maltreatment show heightened levels of CRP in adulthood.

    “Indeed, individuals who were exposed to childhood maltreatment, as well as those exposed to difficult family and socio-economic circumstances in childhood (Taylor et al, 2006), show heightened levels of CRP in adulthood (Bertone-Johnson et al, 2012;Danese et al, 2007;Lin et al, 2016;Matthews et al, 2014;Rooks et al, 2012;Tietjen et al, 2012).”

    From Inflammation in Fear- and Anxiety-Based Disorders: PTSD, GAD, and Beyond (2017) · cites this paper as Lin et al, 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 63

Authors
Lin, J. E., Neylan, T. C., Epel, E., & O’Donovan, A.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lin, Joy E.
  • O’Donovan, Aoife
Venue
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
53
Pages
105-112
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2280099719
Cited by
63
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (U01AG009740)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • University of California, San Francisco (KL2 TR000143)
  • UCSF
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
childhood adversity, C-reactive protein, systemic inflammation, psychological stress, trauma exposure, older adults, interaction effects, Health and Retirement Study
MeSH terms
Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders, Aged, Mental Disorders, C-Reactive Protein, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological, United States, Biomarkers, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review