Cited by 52Tryptophan and brain disordersNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Distinct alterations in motor & reward seeking behavior are dependent on the gestational age of exposure to LPS-induced maternal immune activation

Open access
Straley, Megan E., Van Oeffelen, Wesley, Theze, Sarah, Sullivan, Aideen M., O’Mahony, Siobhain M., Cryan, John F., O’Keeffe, Gerard W.·2017·Brain Behavior and Immunity

Abstract

The dopaminergic system is involved in motivation, reward and the associated motor activities. Mesodiencephalic dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) regulate motivation and reward, whereas those in the substantia nigra (SN) are essential for motor control. Defective VTA dopaminergic transmission has been implicated in schizophrenia, drug addiction and depression whereas dopaminergic neurons in the SN are lost in Parkinson's disease. Maternal immune activation (MIA) leading to in utero inflammation has been proposed to be a risk factor for these disorders, yet it is unclear how this stimulus can lead to the diverse disturbances in dopaminergic-driven behaviors that emerge at different stages of life in affected offspring. Here we report that gestational age is a critical determinant of the subsequent alterations in dopaminergic-driven behavior in rat offspring exposed to lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced MIA. Behavioral analysis revealed that MIA on gestational day 16 but not gestational day 12 resulted in biphasic impairments in motor behavior. Specifically, motor impairments were evident in early life, which were resolved by adolescence, but subsequently re-emerged in adulthood. In contrast, reward seeking behaviors were altered in offspring exposed MIA on gestational day 12. These changes were not due to a loss of dopaminergic neurons per se in the postnatal period, suggesting that they reflect functional changes in dopaminergic systems. This highlights that gestational age may be a key determinant of how MIA leads to distinct alterations in dopaminergic-driven behavior across the lifespan of affected offspring.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.06.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 102 · Cited by 52

Authors
Straley, M. E., Van Oeffelen, W., Theze, S., Sullivan, A. M., O’Mahony, S. M., Cryan, J. F., & O’Keeffe, G. W.
Affiliations
University College Cork (IE)
Corresponding author
O’Keeffe, Gerard W.
Venue
Brain Behavior and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
63
Pages
21-34
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2409207023
Cited by
52
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HRB National Drugs Library (Health Research Board) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
maternal immune activation, lipopolysaccharide, gestational age, dopaminergic system, ventral tegmental area, substantia nigra, reward seeking, motor behavior, schizophrenia risk
MeSH terms
Animals, Dopamine, Female, Gestational Age, Inflammation, Male, Motor Activity, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Reward, Substantia Nigra, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Ventral Tegmental Area, Rats, Dopaminergic Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review