From dried bear bile to molecular investigation: A systematic review of the effect of bile acids on cell apoptosis, oxidative stress and inflammation in the brain, across pre-clinical models of neurological, neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders
Abstract
Bile acids, mainly ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and its conjugated species glycoursodeoxycholic acid (GUDCA) and tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) have long been known to have anti-apoptotic, anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Due to their beneficial actions, recent studies have started to investigate the effect of UDCA, GUDCA, TUDCA on the same mechanisms in pre-clinical models of neurological, neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders, where increased cell apoptosis, oxidative stress and inflammation in the brain are often observed. A total of thirty-five pre-clinical studies were identified through PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Embase, PsychInfo, and CINAHL databases, investigating the role of the UDCA, GUDCA and TUDCA in the regulation of brain apoptosis, oxidative stress and inflammation, in pre-clinical models of neurological, neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders. Findings show that UDCA reduces apoptosis, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α production in neurodegenerative models, and reduces nitric oxide (NO) and interleukin (IL)-1β production in neuropsychiatric models; GUDCA decreases lactate dehydrogenase, TNF-α and IL-1β production in neurological models, and also reduces cytochrome c peroxidase production in neurodegenerative models; TUDCA decreases apoptosis in neurological models, reduces ROS and IL-1β production in neurodegenerative models, and decreases apoptosis and TNF-α production, and increases glutathione production in neuropsychiatric models. In addition, findings suggest that all the three bile acids would be equally beneficial in models of Huntington's disease, whereas UDCA and TUDCA would be more beneficial in models of Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease, while GUDCA in models of bilirubin encephalopathy and TUDCA in models of depression. Overall, this review confirms the therapeutic potential of UDCA, GUDCA and TUDCA in neurological, neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders, proposing bile acids as potential alternative therapeutic approaches for patients suffering from these disorders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
UDCA and TUDCA exert anti-inflammatory effects by activating the nuclear receptor FXR and membrane receptor TGR5, both found in microglia and neurons.
“They exert anti-inflammatory effects by activating the nuclear receptor Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and membrane receptor Takeda G-protein-coupled receptor 5 (TGR5), both of which are found in microglia and neurons.365,366”
From Microbiota–gut–brain axis and its therapeutic applications in neurodegenerative diseases (2024) · cites this paper as [366]
Specific BAs demonstrate neuroprotective effects in cellular and animal models.
“Specific BAs demonstrate neuroprotective effects in cellular and animal models, with human clinical trials underway (306–308).”
From Signalling cognition: The gut microbiota and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (2023) · cites this paper as [307]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 103 · Cited by 117
- Authors
- Huang, F., Pariante, C. M., & Borsini, A.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Borsini, Alessandra
- Venue
- Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 99
- Pages
- 132-146
- ISSN
- 0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3201731816
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 103
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81703734)
- Medical Research Council (MR/L014815/1, MR/J002739/1, MR/N029488/1)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (N 848158)
- Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (21ZR1460600)
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
- Psychiatry Research Trust
- King's College London
- Horizon 2020
- King’s College London
- National Institute for Health Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Aldose Reductase and Taurine
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- bile acids, ursodeoxycholic acid, glycoursodeoxycholic acid, tauroursodeoxycholic acid, apoptosis, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, neurodegenerative diseases, neuropsychiatric disorders, Huntington's disease, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, kernicterus, depression, reactive oxygen species, TNF-α, IL-1β, glutathione
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Ursidae, Bile, Bile Acids and Salts, Brain, Humans, Inflammation, Apoptosis, Oxidative Stress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review