The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Classification of HLA-Matching for Retrospective Analysis of Unrelated Donor Transplantation: Revised Definitions to Predict Survival
Open accessAbstract
The best unrelated donors (URD) for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are alleles matched at HLA-A, -B, -C, and DRB1. Earlier studies mostly used incomplete or lower resolution HLA typing for analysis of transplant outcome. To understand the impact of incomplete HLA characterization, we analyzed 14,797 URD HCT (1995-2006) using multivariable regression modeling adjusting for factors affecting survival. Of 21 matching cohorts, we identified 3 groups with significantly different outcomes. Well-matched cases had either no identified HLA mismatch and informative data at 4 loci or allele matching at HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 (n = 7477, 50% of the population). Partially matched pairs had a defined, single-locus mismatch and/or missing HLA data (n = 4962, 34%). Mismatched cases had > or =2 allele or antigen mismatches (n = 2358, 16%). Multivariate adjusted 5-year survival estimates were: well-matched: 54.1 (95% confidence interval), 52.9-55.4), partially matched: 43.7 (42.3-45.2), and mismatched: 33.4 (32.5-36.5), P < .001. A better matched donor yielded 10%-11% better 5-year survival. Importantly, intermediate resolution -A, -B, and -DRB1 alleles matched "6/6 antigen matched" HCT had survival outcomes within the partially matched cohort. We suggest that these proposed HLA subgroupings be used when complete HLA typing is not available. This improved categorization of HLA matching status allows adjustment for donor-recipient HLA compatibility, and can standardize interpretations of prior URD HCT experience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Long-Term Survival and Late Deaths After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Wingard, J. R., Majhail, N. S., Brazauskas, R., Wang, Z., Sobocinski, K. A., Jacobsohn, D., Sorror, M. L., Horowitz, M. M., Bolwell, B., Rizzo, J. D., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.33.7212 · Cited by 632
Self-citationArai, S., Arora, M., Wang, T., Spellman, S. R., He, W., Couriel, D. R., Urbano-Ispizua, A., Cutler, C. S., Bacigalupo, A. A., Battiwalla, M., et al. (2015) · Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation · doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.10.021 · Cited by 440
Self-citationSureda, A., Bader, P., Cesaro, S., Dreger, P., Duarte, R. F., Dufour, C., Falkenburg, J. H. F., Farge-Bancel, D., Gennery, A., Kröger, N., et al. (2015) · Bone Marrow Transplantation · doi:10.1038/bmt.2015.6 · Cited by 337
Dreger, P., Döhner, H., Ritgen, M., Böttcher, S., Busch, R., Dietrich, S., Bunjes, D., Cohen, S., Schubert, J., Hegenbart, U., et al. (2010) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2010-03-275420 · Cited by 305
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-50 years of evolution and future perspectives
Henig, I., & Zuckerman, T. (2014) · Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal · doi:10.5041/rmmj.10162 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Weisdorf, D., Spellman, S., Haagenson, M., Horowitz, M., Lee, S., Anasetti, C., Setterholm, M., Drexler, R., Maiers, M., King, R., Confer, D., & Klein, J.
- Venue
- Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 748-758
- ISSN
- 1083-8791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005499564
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification of HLA-Matching for Retrospective Analysis of Unrelated Donor Transplantation: Revised Definitions to Predict Survival. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.04.003
- The paper
- Weisdorf, D., Spellman, S., Haagenson, M., Horowitz, M., Lee, S., Anasetti, C., Setterholm, M., Drexler, R., Maiers, M., King, R., Confer, D., & Klein, J. (2008). Classification of HLA-Matching for Retrospective Analysis of Unrelated Donor Transplantation: Revised Definitions to Predict Survival. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.04.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.