Behavioral response to novelty correlates with dopamine receptor availability in striatum of Göttingen minipigs
Abstract
Behavioral response to novelty in rats has been linked both to dopamine transmission in the ventral striatum, and to propensity to self-administer psychostimulant drugs. In order to probe the relationship between behavioral response to novelty and dopamine systems we have developed a behavioral model for correlation with positron emission tomography (PET) of dopamine transmission in brain of Göttingen minipigs. In the present study, we measured exploration of a novel object by recording the number of contacts, and duration of contact with a novel object, in groups of six male and six female adult minipigs. We hypothesized that these novelty scores would correlate with the amphetamine-evoked dopamine release in ventral striatum, measured 2 weeks later in a PET study of the availability of binding sites for the dopamine D2/3 antagonist [11C]raclopride. There were significant correlations between duration of contact with a novel object and the amphetamine-evoked reductions in binding potential (DeltapB) in the left ventral striatum of the 12 animals; Comparison of results by gender revealed that the correlation was driven mainly by the male group, and was not present in the female group. We interpret these results to show that propensity to explore an unfamiliar object is relatively elevated in pigs with low basal occupancy of dopamine D2/3 receptors by endogenous dopamine, and with high amphetamine-induced occupancy of released dopamine in the male pigs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recruitment of brain regions involved in reward processing has been linked to measures of sensation seeking in humans and animals.
“Recruitment of brain regions and systems implicated in reward-processing (e.g., ventral striatum, orbitofrontal cortex) has been linked to measures of sensation seeking in humans and animals”
From Impact of socio-emotional context, brain development, and pubertal maturation on adolescent risk-taking (2013) · cites this paper as Lind, 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Lind, N. M., Gjedde, A., Moustgaard, A., Olsen, A. K., Jensen, S. B., Jakobsen, S., Arnfred, S. M., Hansen, A. K., Hemmingsen, R. P., & Cumming, P.
- Affiliations
- Bispebjerg Hospital (DK)
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Lind, Nanna Marie
- Venue
- Behavioural Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 172-177
- ISSN
- 0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018860647
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Statens Naturvidenskabelige Forskningsrad
- Danmarks Grundforskningsfond
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- novelty exploration, dopamine D2/D3 receptors, ventral striatum, [11C]raclopride, Göttingen minipig, sex differences
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Animals, Carbon Radioisotopes, Corpus Striatum, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Male, Personality, Receptors, Dopamine, Sex Factors, Swine, Swine, Miniature, Tissue Distribution, Raclopride, Positron-Emission Tomography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review