Cited by 31Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Clozapine but not haloperidol treatment reverses sub-chronic phencyclidine-induced disruption of conditional discrimination performance

Dunn, Michael J., Killcross, Simon·2006·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Abusers of phencyclidine (PCP) often present with a symptom profile similar to that exhibited by schizophrenic patients. Animal models utilising such psychotomimetics are currently informing research into the condition. Accumulating evidence suggests that a central cognitive deficit in schizophrenia is the inability to use task-setting cues to guide goal directed behaviour and that this ability is mediated by prefrontal dopamine (DA). The current study used the non-competitive NMDA antagonist phencyclidine (PCP) and Haloperidol (typical antipsychotic) and Clozapine (atypical antipsychotic) in order to further investigate the influence of DAergic manipulation on a task that requires the use of conditional information to inform goal-directed performance. An instrumental conditional discrimination task was employed in which rats learn to respond appropriately according to the presence of specific auditory conditional stimuli. Probe test 1 showed impaired conditional discrimination performance following sub-chronic PCP administration (seven twice-daily injection protocol) compared to control which was reversed by acute treatment with clozapine (5 mg/kg) but not haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) both administered 60 min pre-test. Probe test 2 (8 days post-treatment) showed enduring deficits to conditional discrimination performance that were again reversed by clozapine but not haloperidol (injection procedures as above). These results show that tasks dependent upon conditional relationships…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.08.028

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunn, M. J., & Killcross, S.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff Metropolitan University (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Dunn, Michael J.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-12
Volume
175
Issue
2
Pages
271-277
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069109778
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
phencyclidine, clozapine, haloperidol, NMDA receptor antagonists, schizophrenia, prefrontal dopamine, conditional discrimination, goal-directed behavior, cognitive impairment, atypical antipsychotics, typical antipsychotics
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Clozapine, Cognition Disorders, Conditioning, Operant, Discrimination Learning, Dopamine, Goals, Haloperidol, Male, Phencyclidine, Antipsychotic Agents, Prefrontal Cortex, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review