Cited by 48Motor Control and AdaptationRNA Research and SplicingGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Motor coordination defects in mice deficient for the Sam68 RNA-binding protein

Lukong, Kiven E., Richard, Stéphane·2008·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

The role of RNA-binding proteins in the central nervous system and more specifically their role in motor coordination and learning are poorly understood. We previously reported that ablation of RNA-binding protein Sam68 in mice results in male sterility and delayed mammary gland development and protection against osteoporosis in females. Sam68 however is highly expressed in most regions of the brain especially the cerebellum and thus we investigated the cerebellar-related manifestations in Sam68-null mice. We analyzed the mice for motor function, sensory function, and learning and memory abilities. Herein, we report that Sam68-null mice have motor coordination defects as assessed by beam walking and rotorod performance. Forty-week-old Sam68-null mice (n=12) were compared to their wild-type littermates (n=12). The Sam68-null mice exhibited more hindpaw faults in beam walking tests and fell from the rotating drum at lower speeds and prematurely compared to the wild-type controls. The Sam68-null mice were, however, normal for forelimb strength, tail-hang reflex, balance test, grid walking, the Morris water task, recognition memory, visual discrimination, auditory stimulation and conditional taste aversion. Our findings support a role for Sam68 in the central nervous system in the regulation of motor coordination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.01.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Germline Sam68-null mice have deficits of bone metabolism, sexual organ development, motor coordination and motor learning.

    “Germline Sam68-null mice have deficits of bone metabolism, sexual organ development, motor coordination and motor learning95,96”

    From The neurogenetics of alternative splicing (2016) · cites this paper as [96]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 48

Authors
Lukong, K. E., & Richard, S.
Affiliations
Jewish General Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Richard, Stéphane
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
189
Issue
2
Pages
357-363
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095540683
Cited by
48
References
36
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
Sam68, RNA-binding proteins, motor coordination, cerebellum, beam walking, rotorod performance, motor learning, learning and memory, sensory function, recognition memory
MeSH terms
Animals, Avoidance Learning, Cerebellum, Conditioning, Classical, Postural Balance, Gait, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Motor Skills, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Spatial Behavior, RNA-Binding Proteins, Mice, Knockout, Maze Learning, Recognition, Psychology, Rotarod Performance Test, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Mice, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review