Motor coordination defects in mice deficient for the Sam68 RNA-binding protein
Abstract
The role of RNA-binding proteins in the central nervous system and more specifically their role in motor coordination and learning are poorly understood. We previously reported that ablation of RNA-binding protein Sam68 in mice results in male sterility and delayed mammary gland development and protection against osteoporosis in females. Sam68 however is highly expressed in most regions of the brain especially the cerebellum and thus we investigated the cerebellar-related manifestations in Sam68-null mice. We analyzed the mice for motor function, sensory function, and learning and memory abilities. Herein, we report that Sam68-null mice have motor coordination defects as assessed by beam walking and rotorod performance. Forty-week-old Sam68-null mice (n=12) were compared to their wild-type littermates (n=12). The Sam68-null mice exhibited more hindpaw faults in beam walking tests and fell from the rotating drum at lower speeds and prematurely compared to the wild-type controls. The Sam68-null mice were, however, normal for forelimb strength, tail-hang reflex, balance test, grid walking, the Morris water task, recognition memory, visual discrimination, auditory stimulation and conditional taste aversion. Our findings support a role for Sam68 in the central nervous system in the regulation of motor coordination.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Germline Sam68-null mice have deficits of bone metabolism, sexual organ development, motor coordination and motor learning.
“Germline Sam68-null mice have deficits of bone metabolism, sexual organ development, motor coordination and motor learning95,96”
From The neurogenetics of alternative splicing (2016) · cites this paper as [96]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Lukong, K. E., & Richard, S.
- Affiliations
- Jewish General Hospital (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Richard, Stéphane
- Venue
- Behavioural Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 189
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 357-363
- ISSN
- 0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095540683
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Keywords
- Sam68, RNA-binding proteins, motor coordination, cerebellum, beam walking, rotorod performance, motor learning, learning and memory, sensory function, recognition memory
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Avoidance Learning, Cerebellum, Conditioning, Classical, Postural Balance, Gait, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Motor Skills, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Spatial Behavior, RNA-Binding Proteins, Mice, Knockout, Maze Learning, Recognition, Psychology, Rotarod Performance Test, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Mice, Muscle Strength
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review