Cited by 42Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

MGlu5 antagonism impairs exploration and memory of spatial and non-spatial stimuli in rats

Christoffersen, Gert R.J., Simonyi, Agnes, Schachtman, Todd R., Clausen, Bettina, Clement, David, Bjerre, Vicky K., Mark, Louise T., Reinholdt, Mette +2 more·2008·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGlu5) has been implicated in memory processing in some but not all learning tasks. The reason why this receptor is involved in some tasks but not in others remains to be determined. The present experiments using rats examined effects of the mGlu5-antagonist 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP)--applied systemically i.p. (1-10mg/kg) or bilaterally into the prelimbic cortex (1-10 microg)---on the ability of rats to explore and remember new stimuli. A cross-maze, open field, and object recognition task were used to evaluate exploration and memory and it was found that: (1) locomotion during exploration of spatial environments and exploration time at novel objects were reduced by i.p. but not by prelimbic administration of MPEP, (2) spatial short-term memory was impaired in cross-maze and object discrimination was reduced after both types of administration, (3) long-term retention of spatial conditioning in the cross-maze was inhibited after i.p. applications which (4) also inhibited spontaneous alternation performance during maze-exploration. Reduced exploratory locomotion and exploration time after i.p. injections may have contributed to the observed retention impairments. However, the fact that prelimbic administration of MPEP inhibited retention without reducing exploration shows that memory formation was also impacted directly by prelimbic mGlu5 in both spatial and non-spatial learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.03.032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 42

Authors
Christoffersen, G. R. J., Simonyi, A., Schachtman, T. R., Clausen, B., Clement, D., Bjerre, V. K., Mark, L. T., Reinholdt, M., Schmith-Rasmussen, K., & Zink, L. V. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Christoffersen, Gert R.J.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
191
Issue
2
Pages
235-245
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066829643
Cited by
42
References
51
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
metabotropic glutamate receptor 5, MPEP, spatial memory, object recognition memory, exploratory behavior, prelimbic cortex, spatial short-term memory, spatial conditioning, spontaneous alternation, locomotion, memory formation
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cerebral Cortex, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Routes, Exploratory Behavior, Locomotion, Male, Memory Disorders, Picrotoxin, Pyridines, Space Perception, Time Factors, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, GABA Antagonists, Maze Learning, Pattern Recognition, Physiological, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review