Cited by 66Stress Responses and CortisolTreatment of Major DepressionNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Cytoskeletal alterations in rat hippocampus following chronic unpredictable mild stress and re-exposure to acute and chronic unpredictable mild stress

Yang, Can, Wang, Gaohua, Wang, Huiling, Liu, Zhongchun, Wang, Xiaoping·2009·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

The intrinsic dynamic instability of the cytoskeletal microtubular system is essential for neuronal development and organization. The modulation of microtubule dynamics depends on the phosphorylation of neuronal microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs). Chronic unpredicted mild stress (CUMS) affects hippocampal structure and function in the rat. The aim of the present work was to investigate the possible alteration of cytoskeleton in the hippocampus of rats exposed to CUMS and re-exposed to CUMS to mimic depression and the recurrence of depression of human. We investigated the effects of CUMS, fluoxetine and re-exposure to CUMS on alpha-tubulin isoforms associated with microtubule dynamics, MAP-2 and phospho-MAP-2 in the hippocampus of rats. Our results showed that rats submitted to CUMS once showed a significant reduction in locomotion and sucrose preference which indicate a state of anhedonia. These behavioral alterations were accompanied by specific alterations in hippocampal alpha-tubulin isoforms and phospho-MAP-2 expression, indicating less microtubule dynamics and the possible mechanism. Treatment of fluoxetine could reverse CUMS-induced impairment. Moreover, there were more dramatically changes in behaviors, alpha-tubulin isoforms and phospho-MAP-2 of rats re-exposed to CUMS compared to the rats exposed to CUMS once. These findings provide evidence that rats exposed to CUMS and re-exposed to CUMS showed impairment of microtubule dynamics accompanied with the decreased level of phospho-MAP-2, providing insight into the role of cytoskeleton in the depression and recurrent of depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.08.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 66

Authors
Yang, C., Wang, G., Wang, H., Liu, Z., & Wang, X.
Affiliations
Wuhan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Gaohua
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12-28
Volume
205
Issue
2
Pages
518-524
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105815100
Cited by
66
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
chronic unpredictable mild stress, hippocampus, cytoskeleton, microtubule dynamics, MAP2, depression, recurrent depression, fluoxetine, anhedonia
MeSH terms
Animals, Chronic Disease, Cytoskeleton, Depressive Disorder, Disease Models, Animal, Feeding Behavior, Fluoxetine, Hippocampus, Locomotion, Male, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Microtubules, Phosphorylation, Stress, Psychological, Tubulin, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation, Dietary Sucrose, Protein Isoforms, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review