Cited by 210Motor Control and AdaptationMemory and Neural MechanismsReinforcement Learning in Robotics

Structure learning in action

Open access
Braun, Daniel A., Mehring, Carsten, Wolpert, Daniel M.·2010·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

'Learning to learn' phenomena have been widely investigated in cognition, perception and more recently also in action. During concept learning tasks, for example, it has been suggested that characteristic features are abstracted from a set of examples with the consequence that learning of similar tasks is facilitated-a process termed 'learning to learn'. From a computational point of view such an extraction of invariants can be regarded as learning of an underlying structure. Here we review the evidence for structure learning as a 'learning to learn' mechanism, especially in sensorimotor control where the motor system has to adapt to variable environments. We review studies demonstrating that common features of variable environments are extracted during sensorimotor learning and exploited for efficient adaptation in novel tasks. We conclude that structure learning plays a fundamental role in skill learning and may underlie the unsurpassed flexibility and adaptability of the motor system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.08.031

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The need for hierarchical learning is at the heart of attention control.

    “The need for hierarchical learning has been discussed in relation to motor control and cognitive tasks (Braun et al., 2010; Johnson et al., 2012) and, as it is clear from this discussion, is also at the heart of attention control.”

    From Attention, learning, and the value of information (2012) · cites this paper as Braun et al., 2010

  • Humans infer hidden models of complex tasks, and lower animals also possess this capacity.

    “Converging evidence shows that humans indeed infer hidden models of complex tasks (Acuna and Schrater, 2010; Braun et al., 2010; Daw et al., 2011; Gershman and Niv, 2010; Yakushijin and Jacobs, 2011), and indirect evidence from tasks involving schemas or contextual associations suggests that lower animals also possess this capacity (Balan and Gottlieb, 2006; Braun et al., 2010; Johnson et al., 201”

    From Attention, learning, and the value of information (2012) · cites this paper as Braun et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 125 · Cited by 210

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]Åström K.J. Wittenmark B. Adaptive control 2nd ed. 1995 Addison-Wesley Reading, MA
  2. [13]Reznikova Z.I. Animal intelligence: from individual to social cognition 2007 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, New York
  3. [81]Arutyunyan G.H. Gurfinkel V.S. Mirskii M.L. Investigation of aiming at a target Biophysics 13 1968 536 538 5747585

Authors
Braun, D. A., Mehring, C., & Wolpert, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Braun, Daniel A.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
206
Issue
2
Pages
157-165
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170789952
Cited by
210
References
125
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • SENSOPAC IST-2005-028056
  • Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
structure learning, meta-learning, sensorimotor control, motor adaptation, invariant learning, skill acquisition, concept learning, variable environments
MeSH terms
Animals, Cognition, Concept Formation, Humans, Learning, Models, Neurological, Motor Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review