Cited by 112Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMedicinal Plant Extracts Effects

Intra-dorsal periaqueductal gray administration of cannabidiol blocks panic-like response by activating 5-HT1A receptors

Soares, Vanessa de Paula, Campos, Alline Cristina, Bortoli, Valquíria Camin de, Zangrossi, Hélio, Guimarães, Francisco Silveira, Zuardi, Antonio Waldo·2010·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Activation of 5-HT1A receptors in the dorsal periaqueductal gray (dPAG) impairs escape behavior, suggesting a panicolytic-like effect. Cannabidiol (CBD), a major non-psychotomimetic compound present in Cannabis sativa, causes anxiolytic-like effects after intra-dPAG microinjections by activating 5-HT1A receptors. In the present work we tested the hypothesis that CBD could also impair escape responses evoked by two proposed animal models of panic: the elevated T-maze (ETM) and electric stimulation of dPAG. In experiment 1 male Wistar rats with a single cannula implanted in the dPAG received a microinjection of CBD or vehicle and, 10 min later, were submitted to the ETM and open field tests. In experiment 2 escape electrical threshold was measured in rats with chemitrodes implanted in the dPAG before and 10 min after CBD microinjection. In experiment 3 similar to experiment 2 except that the animals received a previous intra-dPAG administration of WAY-100635, a 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, before CBD treatment. In the ETM microinjection of CBD into the dPAG impaired inhibitory avoidance acquisition, an anxiolytic-like effect, and inhibited escape response, a panicolytic-like effect. The drug also increased escape electrical threshold, an effect that was prevented by WAY-100635. Together, the results suggest that CBD causes panicolytic effects in the dPAG by activating 5-HT1A receptors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 112

Authors
Soares, V. D. P., Campos, A. C., Bortoli, V. C. D., Zangrossi, H., Guimarães, F. S., & Zuardi, A. W.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
213
Issue
2
Pages
225-229
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070697863
Cited by
112
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scientific Electronic Library Online (São Paulo Research Foundation, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
  • Universidade de São Paulo
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects
Keywords
cannabidiol, 5-HT1A receptor, dorsal periaqueductal gray, panicolytic effect, anxiolytic effects, elevated T-maze, escape behavior, passive avoidance, WAY-100635, 5-HT1A receptor antagonist
MeSH terms
Animals, Cannabidiol, Electric Stimulation, Male, Microinjections, Panic, Periaqueductal Gray, Piperazines, Pyridines, Rats, Wistar, Maze Learning, Models, Animal, Rats, Serotonin 5-HT1 Receptor Agonists, Serotonin 5-HT1 Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review