Cited by 112Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeurological disorders and treatments

Exercise effects on motor and affective behavior and catecholamine neurochemistry in the MPTP-lesioned mouse

Open access
Gorton, Lori M., Vuckovic, Marta G., Vertelkina, Nina, Petzinger, Giselle M., Jakowec, Michael W., Wood, Ruth I.·2010·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

This study used 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6,-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) in mice to determine if exercise improves behavior and dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5HT) content. Male C57BL/6 mice received MPTP (4 x 20mg/kg) or saline. They remained sedentary or exercised by treadmill or voluntary running wheel for 6 weeks (n=8/group). Saline-treated mice ran significantly faster on running wheels (22.8+/-1.0m/min) than on treadmill (8.5+/-0.5m/min), and MPTP lesion did not reduce voluntary exercise (19.3+/-1.5m/min, p>0.05). There was a significant effect of both lesion and exercise on overall Rotarod performance (ORP): MPTP lesion reduced ORP, while treadmill exercise increased ORP vs sedentary mice (p<0.05). MPTP increased anxiety in the marble-burying test: sedentary lesioned mice buried more marbles (74.0+/-5.2%) than sedentary controls (34.8+/-11.8%, p<0.05). Conversely, exercise reduced anxiety on the elevated plus maze. Among saline-treated mice, those exposed to voluntary wheel-running showed an increased percent of open arm entries (49.8+/-3.5%, p<0.05) relative to sedentary controls (36.2+/-4.0%, p<0.05). Neither MPTP nor exercise altered symptoms of depression measured by sucrose preference or tail suspension. MPTP significantly reduced DA in striatum (in sedentary lesioned mice to 42.1+/-3.0% of saline controls), and lowered 5HT in amygdala and striatum (in sedentary lesioned mice to 86.1+/-4.1% and 66.5+/-8.2% of saline controls, respectively); exercise had no effect. Thus, exercise improves behavior in a model of DA depletion, without changes in DA or 5HT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.009

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the MPTP-lesioned mouse model exercise does increase cognitive performances, reducing anxiety and increasing learning on the elevated plus maze test, but without effects on tests of depression-like state.

    “Concerning running, there is evidence that in the MPTP-lesioned mouse model exercise does increase cognitive performances, reducing anxiety and increasing learning on the elevated plus maze test, but without effects on tests of depression-like state (Gorton et al., 2010).”

    From Depression and adult neurogenesis: Positive effects of the antidepressant fluoxetine and of physical exercise (2018) · cites this paper as Gorton et al., 2010

    The Results (Behavior; page unavailable) report no effect of exercise on the depression-like measures, and reduced anxiety on the elevated plus maze only in saline-treated wheel-running mice. In MPTP-lesioned mice, wheel-running did not change the maze measure, while treadmill exercise changed it in the direction of greater anxiety. The Methods (Behavior; page unavailable) identify the elevated plus maze as an anxiety test, not a learning test; the paper does not report improved cognitive performance from exercise. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 96 · Cited by 112

Authors
Gorton, L. M., Vuckovic, M. G., Vertelkina, N., Petzinger, G. M., Jakowec, M. W., & Wood, R. I.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Wood, Ruth I.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
213
Issue
2
Pages
253-262
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970581195
Cited by
112
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (DC009125, NS44327)
  • US Army (NETRP W81XWH-04-1-0444)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
physical activity, MPTP, Parkinson's disease model, dopamine depletion, serotonin, catecholamines, voluntary wheel running, treadmill exercise, motor behavior, anxiety, depression, rotarod performance, striatum, amygdala, neuroprotection
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Corticosterone, Depression, Disease Models, Animal, Dopamine, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Motor Activity, Parkinson Disease, Physical Conditioning, Animal, Serotonin, 1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine, Rotarod Performance Test, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review