Exercise effects on motor and affective behavior and catecholamine neurochemistry in the MPTP-lesioned mouse
Open accessAbstract
This study used 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6,-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) in mice to determine if exercise improves behavior and dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5HT) content. Male C57BL/6 mice received MPTP (4 x 20mg/kg) or saline. They remained sedentary or exercised by treadmill or voluntary running wheel for 6 weeks (n=8/group). Saline-treated mice ran significantly faster on running wheels (22.8+/-1.0m/min) than on treadmill (8.5+/-0.5m/min), and MPTP lesion did not reduce voluntary exercise (19.3+/-1.5m/min, p>0.05). There was a significant effect of both lesion and exercise on overall Rotarod performance (ORP): MPTP lesion reduced ORP, while treadmill exercise increased ORP vs sedentary mice (p<0.05). MPTP increased anxiety in the marble-burying test: sedentary lesioned mice buried more marbles (74.0+/-5.2%) than sedentary controls (34.8+/-11.8%, p<0.05). Conversely, exercise reduced anxiety on the elevated plus maze. Among saline-treated mice, those exposed to voluntary wheel-running showed an increased percent of open arm entries (49.8+/-3.5%, p<0.05) relative to sedentary controls (36.2+/-4.0%, p<0.05). Neither MPTP nor exercise altered symptoms of depression measured by sucrose preference or tail suspension. MPTP significantly reduced DA in striatum (in sedentary lesioned mice to 42.1+/-3.0% of saline controls), and lowered 5HT in amygdala and striatum (in sedentary lesioned mice to 86.1+/-4.1% and 66.5+/-8.2% of saline controls, respectively); exercise had no effect. Thus, exercise improves behavior in a model of DA depletion, without changes in DA or 5HT.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the MPTP-lesioned mouse model exercise does increase cognitive performances, reducing anxiety and increasing learning on the elevated plus maze test, but without effects on tests of depression-like state.
“Concerning running, there is evidence that in the MPTP-lesioned mouse model exercise does increase cognitive performances, reducing anxiety and increasing learning on the elevated plus maze test, but without effects on tests of depression-like state (Gorton et al., 2010).”
From Depression and adult neurogenesis: Positive effects of the antidepressant fluoxetine and of physical exercise (2018) · cites this paper as Gorton et al., 2010
The Results (Behavior; page unavailable) report no effect of exercise on the depression-like measures, and reduced anxiety on the elevated plus maze only in saline-treated wheel-running mice. In MPTP-lesioned mice, wheel-running did not change the maze measure, while treadmill exercise changed it in the direction of greater anxiety. The Methods (Behavior; page unavailable) identify the elevated plus maze as an anxiety test, not a learning test; the paper does not report improved cognitive performance from exercise. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 96 · Cited by 112
- Authors
- Gorton, L. M., Vuckovic, M. G., Vertelkina, N., Petzinger, G. M., Jakowec, M. W., & Wood, R. I.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wood, Ruth I.
- Venue
- Behavioural Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 213
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 253-262
- ISSN
- 0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2902645
- OpenAlex
- W1970581195
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 96
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH (DC009125, NS44327)
- US Army (NETRP W81XWH-04-1-0444)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Keywords
- physical activity, MPTP, Parkinson's disease model, dopamine depletion, serotonin, catecholamines, voluntary wheel running, treadmill exercise, motor behavior, anxiety, depression, rotarod performance, striatum, amygdala, neuroprotection
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anxiety, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Corticosterone, Depression, Disease Models, Animal, Dopamine, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Motor Activity, Parkinson Disease, Physical Conditioning, Animal, Serotonin, 1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine, Rotarod Performance Test, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review