A bird-brain view of episodic memory
Abstract
In humans, the hippocampus plays a critical role in the formation of episodic memories. Although non-human animals are unable to report whether they also re-experience past events, at least some birds and mammals exhibit 'episodic-like' memory characterized by an ability to recall what happened where and when. In mammals, the hippocampus interacts closely with virtually the entire neocortex to form episodic-like memories. The hippocampus receives highly processed information from high-order association areas, and thereby the rest of the neocortex. Distinct neurophysiological hippocampal rhythms (theta and sharp-wave ripples) coordinate activity between the hippocampus and high-order association areas during the encoding and retrieval of information contributing to episodic-like memories. Although recent studies have demonstrated that food hoarding birds are able to remember what food they hid where and when, neuroanatomical and neurophysiological studies suggest that there may be a fundamental difference between episodic-like memory in birds and mammals. In contrast to the mammalian hippocampus, the avian hippocampus only receives visual and olfactory input; most high-order association areas in the avian brain involved in performing functions similar to those performed by neocortical association areas do not project to the hippocampus or structures providing it with direct input. Consistent with this neuroanatomical difference, mammalian-like rhythms involved in communicating between the hippocampus and neocortical high-order association areas have not been found in birds. Collectively, this suggests that information contributing to episodic-like memory is more limited and processed in a different manner in birds when compared to mammals.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As the avian hippocampus, in contrast to the mammalian hippocampus, does not receive comparable input from high-order cortical areas, components of daily experiences processed in these areas may not contribute to episodic-like memory formation and retrieval.
“as the avian hippocampus, in contrast to the mammalian hippocampus, does not receive comparable input from high-order cortical areas, components of daily experiences (processed in these areas) may not contribute to episodic-like memory formation and retrieval [53].”
From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [53]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 203 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Rattenborg, N. C., & Martinez-Gonzalez, D.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Rattenborg, N.C.
- ORCID
- Rattenborg, N.C.
- Venue
- Behavioural Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 222
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 236-245
- ISSN
- 0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974785819
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 203
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Max Planck Society
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- episodic-like memory, avian hippocampus, hippocampal-neocortical interaction, theta oscillations, sharp-wave ripples, food hoarding, spatial memory, memory encoding and retrieval
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Birds, Brain, Humans, Neuroanatomy, Neurophysiology, Mental Recall
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review