Cited by 69Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudySmoking Behavior and CessationNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Nicotinic agonist-induced improvement of vigilance in mice in the 5-choice continuous performance test

Open access
Young, Jared W., Meves, Jessica M., Geyer, Mark A.·2013·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Impaired attentional processing is prevalent in numerous neuropsychiatric disorders and may negatively impact other cognitive and functional domains. Nicotine - a nonspecific nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonist - improves vigilance in healthy subjects and schizophrenia patients as measured by continuous performance tests (CPTs), but the nAChR mediating this effect remains unclear. Here we examine the effects of: (a) nicotine; (b) the selective α7 nAChR agonist PNU 282987; and (c) the selective α4β2 nAChR agonist ABT-418 alone and in combination with scopolamine-induced disruption of mouse 5-choice (5C-)CPT performance. This task requires the inhibition of responses to non-target stimuli as well as active responses to target stimuli, consistent with human CPTs. C57BL/6N mice were trained to perform the 5C-CPT. Drug effects were examined in extended session and variable stimulus-duration challenges of performance. Acute drug effects on scopolamine-induced disruption in performance were also investigated. Nicotine and ABT-418 subtly but significantly improved performance of normal mice and attenuated scopolamine-induced disruptions in the 5C-CPT. PNU 282-987 had no effects on performance. The similarity of nicotine and ABT-418 effects provides support for an α4β2 nAChR mechanism of action for nicotine-induced improvement in attention/vigilance. Moreover, the data provide pharmacological predictive validation for the 5C-CPT because nicotine improved and scopolamine disrupted normal performance of the task, consistent with healthy humans in the CPT. Future studies using more selective agonists may result in more robust improvements in performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.11.028

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Complete absence of α7 nAChRs could alter attention, possibly through changes during development or other compensatory changes that affect attention in adulthood.

    “Thus, even though α7 agonists were without effect on attention (Grottick & Higgins, 2000; Young et al., 2013), the complete absence of α7 nAChRs could alter attention, possibly through changes during development or other compensatory changes that affect attention in adulthood.”

    From Nicotine addiction and psychiatric disorders (2015) · cites this paper as Young et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 69

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [78]Young JW Geyer MA Rissling AJ Eyler LT Asgaard GL Light GA Impaired vigilance but not accuracy of patients with schziophrenia in a human version of the rodent 5-choice continuous performance test Schizophrenia Bulletin 2011 37 236

Authors
Young, J. W., Meves, J. M., & Geyer, M. A.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Young, Jared W.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
240
Pages
119-133
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062264682
Cited by
69
References
82
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01- MH071916, R21-MH085221)
  • NIH Clinical Center
  • Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
nicotine, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, alpha4beta2 nAChR, alpha7 nAChR, PNU-282987, ABT-418, sustained attention, attention, scopolamine, attentional disruption, schizophrenia, pharmacological validation
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Behavior, Animal, Benzamides, Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Choice Behavior, Isoxazoles, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nicotine, Psychomotor Performance, Pyrrolidines, Receptors, Nicotinic, Scopolamine, Cholinergic Antagonists, Nicotinic Agonists, Mice, alpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review