Cited by 46Visual perception and processing mechanismsMultisensory perception and integrationVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Integration of sensory information precedes the sensation of vection: A combined behavioral and event-related brain potential (ERP) study

Keshavarz, Behrang, Berti, Stefan·2014·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Illusory self-motion (known as vection) describes the sensation of ego-motion in the absence of physical movement. Vection typically occurs in stationary observers being exposed to visual information that suggest self-motion (e.g. simulators, virtual reality). In the present study, we tested whether sensory integration of visual information triggers vection: participants (N=13) perceived patterns of moving altered black-and-white vertical stripes on a screen that was divided into a central and a surrounding peripheral visual field. In both fields the pattern was either moving or stationary, resulting in four combinations of central and peripheral motions: (1) central and peripheral stripes moved into the same direction, (2) central and peripheral stripes moved in opposite directions, or (3) either the central or (4) the peripheral stripes were stable while the other stripes were in motion. This stimulation induced vection: Results showed significantly higher vection ratings when the stationary center of the pattern was surrounded by a moving periphery. Event-related potentials mirrored this finding: The occipital N2 was largest with stationary central and moving peripheral stripes. Our findings suggest that sensory integration of peripheral and central visual information triggers the perception of vection. Furthermore, we found evidence that neural processes precede the subjective perception of vection strength prior to the actual onset of vection. We will discuss our findings with respect to the role of stimulus eccentricity, stimulus' depth, and neural correlates involved during the genesis of vection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.10.045

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pattern that created the strongest vection also showed pronounced event-related brain potentials in the occipital lobe around 230 ms after stimulus onset (N2), indicating that the N2 mirrored the subjective rating of vection strength.

    “Results showed that the pattern that created strongest vection also showed pronounced event-related brain potentials in the occipital lobe around 230 ms after stimulus onset (N2), indicating that the N2 mirrored the subjective rating of vection strength.”

    From Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related? (2015) · cites this paper as Keshavarz and Berti, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related?

    Keshavarz, B., Riecke, B. E., Hettinger, L. J., & Campos, J. L. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00472 · Cited by 325 · see citing works

    “Behrang Keshavarz 1*, Bernhard E. Riecke 2, Lawrence J. Hettinger 3 and Jennifer L. Campos 1,4 1 Intelligent Design for Adaptation, Participation and Technology (iDAPT), Research Department, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2 School of Interactive Arts and Technology, S…”
    BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation

Authors
Keshavarz, B., & Berti, S.
Affiliations
  • Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (CA)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Keshavarz, Behrang
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
259
Pages
131-136
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015767789
Cited by
46
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
vection, illusory self-motion, sensory integration, peripheral vision, event-related potentials, N2 component, stimulus eccentricity, visual motion perception, neural correlates of perception, virtual reality
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Illusions, Kinesthesis, Male, Motion Perception, Motion Sickness, Reaction Time, Sensation, Time Factors, Visual Fields, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review