Integration of sensory information precedes the sensation of vection: A combined behavioral and event-related brain potential (ERP) study
Abstract
Illusory self-motion (known as vection) describes the sensation of ego-motion in the absence of physical movement. Vection typically occurs in stationary observers being exposed to visual information that suggest self-motion (e.g. simulators, virtual reality). In the present study, we tested whether sensory integration of visual information triggers vection: participants (N=13) perceived patterns of moving altered black-and-white vertical stripes on a screen that was divided into a central and a surrounding peripheral visual field. In both fields the pattern was either moving or stationary, resulting in four combinations of central and peripheral motions: (1) central and peripheral stripes moved into the same direction, (2) central and peripheral stripes moved in opposite directions, or (3) either the central or (4) the peripheral stripes were stable while the other stripes were in motion. This stimulation induced vection: Results showed significantly higher vection ratings when the stationary center of the pattern was surrounded by a moving periphery. Event-related potentials mirrored this finding: The occipital N2 was largest with stationary central and moving peripheral stripes. Our findings suggest that sensory integration of peripheral and central visual information triggers the perception of vection. Furthermore, we found evidence that neural processes precede the subjective perception of vection strength prior to the actual onset of vection. We will discuss our findings with respect to the role of stimulus eccentricity, stimulus' depth, and neural correlates involved during the genesis of vection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The pattern that created the strongest vection also showed pronounced event-related brain potentials in the occipital lobe around 230 ms after stimulus onset (N2), indicating that the N2 mirrored the subjective rating of vection strength.
“Results showed that the pattern that created strongest vection also showed pronounced event-related brain potentials in the occipital lobe around 230 ms after stimulus onset (N2), indicating that the N2 mirrored the subjective rating of vection strength.”
From Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related? (2015) · cites this paper as Keshavarz and Berti, 2014
Cites
The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing
Lamme, V. A. F., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01657-x · Cited by 2,338 · see citing works
Guldin, W. O., & Grüsser, O.-J. (1998) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(97)01211-3 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
Bayesian integration of visual and vestibular signals for heading
Butler, J. S., Smith, S. T., Campos, J. L., & Bulthoff, H. H. (2010) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/10.11.23 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related?
Keshavarz, B., Riecke, B. E., Hettinger, L. J., & Campos, J. L. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00472 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
“Behrang Keshavarz 1*, Bernhard E. Riecke 2, Lawrence J. Hettinger 3 and Jennifer L. Campos 1,4 1 Intelligent Design for Adaptation, Participation and Technology (iDAPT), Research Department, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2 School of Interactive Arts and Technology, S…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
- Authors
- Keshavarz, B., & Berti, S.
- Affiliations
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (CA)
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Keshavarz, Behrang
- Venue
- Behavioural Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 259
- Pages
- 131-136
- ISSN
- 0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015767789
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Keywords
- vection, illusory self-motion, sensory integration, peripheral vision, event-related potentials, N2 component, stimulus eccentricity, visual motion perception, neural correlates of perception, virtual reality
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Illusions, Kinesthesis, Male, Motion Perception, Motion Sickness, Reaction Time, Sensation, Time Factors, Visual Fields, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review