D1 and D5 dopamine receptors participate on the consolidation of two different memories
Abstract
Memory consolidation is the process by which recently acquired information becomes stable and is modulated by different neurotransmitters depending on the structure involved and the nature of the memory. Here we evaluate the participation of both D1 and D5 dopamine receptors in the CA1 region of the hippocampus in the consolidation of the memory of two different tasks, object recognition (OR) and inhibitory avoidance (IA). For this, male rats with infusion cannulae stereotaxically implanted in the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus were trained in an OR task involving exposure to two different objects, or in a one-trial step-down IA task. At different times after the training, some of the animals received intrahippocampal infusions of the D1-family receptor antagonist SCH-23390. In a test session carried out 24h later, the animals that received infusions immediately or 60 min but not 180 min after the training showed impaired long-term memory. Since D1- and D5-subtypes engage different signaling pathways involving cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) and protein kinase C (PKC), respectively, we assessed whether they participate distinctively in consolidation. The animals that received intra-CA1 infusions of the PKA inhibitor, Rp-cAMP, or the PKC inhibitor, Gö6976, immediately after OR or IA training had a long-term memory impairment and the amnesic effect caused by SCH-23390 was reversed when co-infused with activators of PKA (8Br-cAMP) or PKC (PMA). These results indicate that both D1 and D5 dopamine receptors are required in the CA1 region of the hippocampus for consolidation of the two tasks. This supports the notion of a commonality of consolidation mechanisms across tasks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In another study, an impairment by SCH23390 was reported.
“although in another study an impairment by SCH23390 was reported”
From The medial prefrontal cortex - hippocampus circuit that integrates information of object, place and time to construct episodic memory in rodents: Behavioral, anatomical and neurochemical properties (2020) · cites this paper as Furini et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 79 · Cited by 60
- Authors
- Furini, C. R. G., Myskiw, J. C., Schmidt, B. E., Marcondes, L. A., & Izquierdo, I.
- Affiliations
- Instituto do Cérebro (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Furini, C.R.G.
- Venue
- Behavioural Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 271
- Pages
- 212-217
- ISSN
- 0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064991831
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Council of Brazil
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- dopamine D1 receptor, dopamine D5 receptor, memory consolidation, hippocampal CA1, object recognition memory, passive avoidance, SCH 23390, protein kinase A, protein kinase C, long-term memory, dopamine signaling
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Avoidance Learning, Benzazepines, Carbazoles, Enzyme Inhibitors, Male, Memory, Microinjections, Protein Kinase C, Rats, Wistar, Receptors, Dopamine D1, Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases, Recognition, Psychology, Receptors, Dopamine D5, Rats, CA1 Region, Hippocampal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review