Cited by 46Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Boosting diagnosis accuracy of Alzheimer's disease using high dimensional recognition of longitudinal brain atrophy patterns

Farzan, Ali, Mashohor, Syansiah, Ramli, Abd Rahman, Mahmud, Rozi·2015·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Objective Boosting accuracy in automatically discriminating patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and normal controls (NC), based on multidimensional classification of longitudinal whole brain atrophy rates and their intermediate counterparts in analyzing magnetic resonance images (MRI).Method Longitudinal percentage of brain volume changes (PBVC) in two-year follow up and its intermediate counterparts in early 6-month and late 18-month are used as features in supervised and unsupervised classification procedures based on K-mean, fuzzy clustering method (FCM) and support vector machine (SVM). The most relevant features for classification are selected using discriminative analysis (DA) of features and their principal components (PC). Accuracy of the proposed method is evaluated in a group of 30 patients with AD (16 males, 14 females, age±standard-deviation (SD)=75±1.36 years) and 30 normal controls (15 males, 15 females, age±SD=77±0.88 years) using leave-one-out cross-validation.Results Results indicate superiority of supervised machine learning techniques over unsupervised ones in diagnosing AD and withal, predominance of RBF kernel over lineal one. Accuracies of 83.3%, 83.3%, 90% and 91.7% are achieved in classification by K-mean, FCM, linear SVM and SVM with radial based function (RBF) respectively.Conclusion Evidence that SVM classification of longitudinal atrophy rates may results in high accuracy is given. Additionally, it is realized that use of intermediate atrophy rates and their principal components improves diagnostic accuracy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.04.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 46

Authors
Farzan, A., Mashohor, S., Ramli, A. R., & Mahmud, R.
Affiliations
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Farzan, Ali
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
290
Pages
124-130
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011083232
Cited by
46
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4
FWCI
6.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, brain atrophy, longitudinal brain volume change, MRI diagnosis, support vector machine, fuzzy clustering, K-means clustering, feature selection, principal component analysis, discriminant analysis, Gaussian kernel
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Atrophy, Brain, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Cluster Analysis, Principal Component Analysis, Support Vector Machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review