Cited by 50Memory and Neural MechanismsStress Responses and CortisolNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Maternal separation facilitates extinction of social fear in adult male mice.

Zoicas, Iulia, Neumann, Inga D.·2016·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Early life stress, such as child abuse or neglect, is a risk factor for the development of psychopathologies characterized by abnormal social and emotional behaviors. In rodents, long-lasting changes in stress coping and emotional behavior can be induced by separating pups from their mother. We used maternal separation (MS; 3h daily on postnatal days 1-14) to test whether early life stress alters acquisition and extinction of social fear in adult male mice as studied in a specific model of social fear, i.e., in the social fear conditioning paradigm. We show that MS facilitated extinction of social fear without altering acquisition or expression of social fear. This facilitatory effect of MS on social fear extinction was not due to improved social learning and memory abilities or to increased social interest, as MS rather impaired social memory in the social discrimination test and did not alter social preference in the social preference-avoidance test. In contrast, MS did not alter acquisition and extinction of non-social, cued fear, or non-social memory as assessed in the object discrimination test and non-social anxiety as assessed in the elevated plus-maze. These results suggest that a social stress like MS in early life may improve coping with and recovery from a traumatic social experience in adulthood in mice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.10.034

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zoicas, I., & Neumann, I. D.
Affiliations
University of Regensburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Neumann, Inga D.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
297
Pages
323-328
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1774350554
Cited by
50
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Bayerische Forschungsstiftung
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ne465/23)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
maternal separation, early life stress, social memory, social discrimination, social preferences, elevated plus maze, object discrimination, coping with trauma, adult male mice
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Anxiety, Avoidance Learning, Conditioning, Psychological, Discrimination, Psychological, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Male, Maternal Deprivation, Psychological Tests, Mental Recall, Social Behavior, Stress, Psychological, Maze Learning, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review