Cited by 11Treatment of Major DepressionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Prodepressant- and anxiogenic-like effects of serotonin-selective, but not noradrenaline-selective, antidepressant agents in mice lacking α2-containing GABAA receptors

Open access
Benham, Rebecca S., Hewage, Nishani B., Suckow, Raymond F., Engin, Elif, Rudolph, Uwe·2017·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Deficits in neuronal inhibition via gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A receptors (GABAA-Rs) are implicated in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder and the therapeutic effects of current antidepressant treatments, however, the relevant GABAA-R subtype as defined by its alpha subunit is still unknown. We previously reported anxiety- and depressive-like behavior in alpha2+/- and alpha2-/- mice, respectively (Vollenweider, 2011). We sought to determine whether this phenotype could be reversed by chronic antidepressant treatment. Adult male mice received 4 or 8mg/kg fluoxetine or 53mg/kg desipramine in their drinking water for four weeks before undergoing behavioral testing. In the novelty suppressed feeding test, desipramine had anxiolytic-like effects reducing the latencies to bite and to eat the pellet in both wild-type and alpha2+/- mice. Surprisingly, 4mg/kg fluoxetine had anxiogenic-like effects in alpha2+/- mice increasing latency to bite and to eat while 8mg/kg fluoxetine increased the latency to eat in both wild-type and alpha2+/- mice. In the forced swim and tail suspension tests, chronic desipramine treatment increased latency to immobility in wild-type and alpha2-/- mice. In contrast, chronic fluoxetine treatment increased immobility in alpha2-/- mice in both tasks while generally having no effect in wild-type mice. These findings suggest that in preclinical paradigms of anxiety and behavioral despair the antidepressant-like effects of desipramine are independent of alpha2-containing GABAA-Rs, while a reduction in alpha2 expression leads to an increased sensitivity to anxiogenic- and prodepressant-like effects with chronic fluoxetine treatment, pointing to a potential role of alpha2-containing GABAA-Rs in the response to serotonin-selective antidepressants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.05.063

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In α2 knockdown mice, sensitivity to anxiogenic- and prodepressant-like effects with chronic fluoxetine treatment is increased.

    “More recently it was demonstrated that global knockdown of the α2 subunit also leads to anxiety- and despair-like behavior [9], and that in these mice sensitivity to anxiogenic-and prodepressant-like effects with chronic fluoxetine treatment is increased [128].”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [128]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 11

Authors
Benham, R. S., Hewage, N. B., Suckow, R. F., Engin, E., & Rudolph, U.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Benham, Rebecca S.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
332
Pages
172-179
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2620958995
Cited by
11
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2018-02-15)
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health (R01MH095905)
  • Rappaport Mental Health Research Scholar Award
  • McLean Presidential Fellowship Award
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression Young Investigator Award
  • Eleanor and Miles Shore Harvard Medical School Fellowship
  • Andrew P. Merrill Memorial Research Fellowship
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
fluoxetine, desipramine, anxiogenic effects, novelty-suppressed feeding, forced swim test, tail suspension test, behavioral despair, major depressive disorder, neuronal inhibition
MeSH terms
Animals, Antidepressive Agents, Anxiety, Depression, Desipramine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Feeding Behavior, Fluoxetine, Male, Motor Activity, Phenotype, Receptors, GABA-A, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Mice, Knockout, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors, Mice, 129 Strain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review