Cited by 8Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPhysical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Examining the relationship between aerobic fitness and cognitive control processes: an SFT and ERP study

Fu, Hao-Lun, Kao, Shih-Chun, Yang, Cheng-Ta, Moreau, David, Wang, Chun-Hao·2023·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated a positive relationship between aerobic fitness and cognitive control, the ability to inhibit distractions (conflict control) or impulsive actions (response inhibition). However, it is unknown whether these sub-processes and their underlying information processing capacity are differentially related to aerobic fitness. To address this question, we employed a go/no-go version of the redundant-target task, which was administered concurrently with the recording of event-related potentials (ERPs) and the use of a reaction-time based diagnostic tool known as system factorial technology (SFT). Our sample consisted of 46 young male adults with varying levels of aerobic fitness: the high-fit group (n = 23; aged 21.33 ± 2.44 years; VO 2max 58.83 ± 6.93 ml/kg/min) and the low-fit group (n = 23; aged 22.30 ± 1.40 years; VO 2max 41.90 ± 4.01 ml/kg/min). The results showed that the high-fit group exhibited a lower false-alarm rate compared to the low-fit group. However, there was no difference in processing speed between the two groups. The SFT analysis revealed that the high-fit group had more efficient information processing for earlier responses, but not later responses, compared to the low-fit group. Analysis of the ERPs indicated that the high-fit group had larger N2d amplitudes and shorter P3d latencies during conflict control compared to the low-fit group, while there were no such effects for the process of response inhibition. These findings sugg…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114591

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fu, H.-L., Kao, S.-C., Yang, C.-T., Moreau, D., & Wang, C.-H.
Affiliations
  • National Cheng Kung University (TW)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Taipei Medical University (TW)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Wang, Chun-Hao
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
452
Pages
114591
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4384945004
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science and Technology Council (NSTC 110\u20132628-H-006\u2013004 -MY3)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
cardiorespiratory fitness, cognitive control, conflict control, response inhibition, event-related potentials, N2D+, processing speed, false alarm rate, VO2max, young men
MeSH terms
Cognition, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Male, Physical Fitness, Reaction Time, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review