Cited by 36Liver physiology and pathologyPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismEstrogen and related hormone effects

Sexual dimorphisms in zonal gene expression in mouse liver

Saito, Kosuke, Negishi, Masahiko, James Squires, E.·2013·Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

Abstract

Many of the metabolic functions of the liver are localized either in the pericentral region (zone 3) or in the periportal region (zone 1). However, a systematic analysis of the heterogeneity and sexual dimorphism of gene expression in the liver is lacking. Our objective was to obtain sections of intact tissue from zone 1 and zone 3 from both male and female mouse liver, and to measure the patterns of gene expression in these sections. Zone 1 and zone 3 areas were isolated by laser capture microdissection of liver sections, total RNA was isolated and microarray analysis was conducted using Agilent Whole Mouse Genome oligo arrays. To investigate functional characteristics as well as upstream regulators of specific gene lists, we used Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. We identified more than 925 genes in zone 1 and more than 450 genes in zone 3 of both male and female mice. Sexual dimorphism in metabolic functions was present in zone 1 but not zone 3. In zone 1, canonical pathways related to gluconeogenesis were male predominant, while canonical pathways related to hepatic progenitor cells were female predominant. In addition, we also analyzed the upstream regulators of zone-specific genes. SREBF1 was male-specific in zone 1, while TRIM24 was female-specific in zone 3. These results demonstrate the heterogeneity and sexually dimorphic differences in gene expression in the liver.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.06.025

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SDS was enriched in zone 1 (periportal), while CYP2E1 expression increased in zone 3 (pericentral), as previously described in mouse.

    “SDS was enriched in zone 1 (periportal), while CYP2E1 expression increased in zone 3 (pericentral), as previously described in mouse24–27 (Fig. 1c, e, f; Supplementary Fig. 5a).”
  • These observations are consistent with the classic zonation described in human and mouse liver, supporting the MERFISH measurements.

    “Collectively, these observations are consistent with the classic zonation described in human and mouse liver4,24–26, supporting our MERFISH measurements.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 34 · Cited by 36

Authors
Saito, K., Negishi, M., & James Squires, E.
Affiliations
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US)
Venue
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
436
Issue
4
Pages
730-735
ISSN
0006-291X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039614549
Cited by
36
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Intramural Research Program of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01ES1005-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
sexual dimorphism, periportal zone, pericentral zone, gluconeogenesis, hepatic progenitor cells, SREBF1, TRIM24, upstream regulators, mouse liver
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Liver, Male, Mice, Inbred C3H, Quality Control, Sex Characteristics, Transcription, Genetic, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review