miR-32-5p-mediated Dusp5 downregulation contributes to neuropathic pain
Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated that microRNAs (miRNAs) play important roles in the pathogenesis of neuropathic pain. In the present study, we found that miR-32-5p was significantly upregulated in rats after spinal nerve ligation (SNL), specifically in the spinal microglia of rats with SNL. Functional assays showed that knockdown of miR-32-5p greatly suppressed mechanical allodynia and heat hyperalgesia, and decreased inflammatory cytokine (IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6) protein expression in rats after SNL. Similarly, miR-32-5p knockdown alleviated cytokine production in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated spinal microglial cells, whereas its overexpression had the opposite effect. Mechanistic investigations revealed Dual-specificity phosphatase 5 (Dusp5) as a direct target of miR-32-5p, which is involved in the miR-32-5p-mediated effects on neuropathic pain and neuroinflammation. We demonstrated for the first time that miR-32-5p promotes neuroinflammation and neuropathic pain development through regulation of Dusp5. Our findings highlight a novel contribution of miR-32-5p to the process of neuropathic pain, and suggest possibilities for the development of novel therapeutic options for neuropathic pain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The hsa-miR-142 family has previously been associated with microglia in murine brain and linked to neuroinflammation in murine models.
“previously associated with microglia in murine brain 44 and linked to neuroinflammation in murine models 46,47”
From Human brain microRNAs exhibit cell-type specificity and age dependence (2026) · cites this paper as [46]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human brain microRNAs exhibit cell-type specificity and age dependence
Dubnov, S., Laski, L., Zchut, I., Avidan, O., Bennett, E. R., Greenberg, D. S., Turjeman, A., Nitzan, M., Paldor, I., & Soreq, H. (2026) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.04.697535
- Authors
- Yan, T., Zhang, F., Sun, C., Sun, J., Wang, Y., Xu, X., Shi, J., & Shi, G.
- Venue
- Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 495
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 506-511
- ISSN
- 0006-291X
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81371252)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review