Cited by 54Microbial Inactivation MethodsTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineLiver physiology and pathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Molecular and histological study on the effects of non-thermal irreversible electroporation on the liver

Open access
Zhang, Yanfang, Lyu, Chenang, Liu, Yu, Lv, Yanpeng, Chang, Tammy T., Rubinsky, Boris·2018·Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

Abstract

Non-thermal irreversible electroporation (NTIRE) is a biophysical phenomenon in which certain electric fields delivered across the cell membrane in tissue, cause cell death, without affecting the extracellular matrix. "Minimally invasive regenerative surgery" is a new medical modality for treatment of end-stage organ or tissue failure in which exogenous cells are implanted in a decellularized niche in tissue, formed by the delivery of NTIRE electric fields across a targeted volume of tissue. We anticipate that the success of the procedure will depend on the time of implantation relative to the application of NTIRE. This study was performed to elucidate the histological and molecular events that occur within 24 h after NTIRE, in the context of optimal criteria for the time of implantation. To this end, we examined the histology of NTIRE treated rat liver with H&E, Masson trichrome and TUNEL staining. Western blot was used to examine pro and cleaved caspase-3 (marker for apoptosis), pro and cleaved caspase-1 and gasdermin D (markers for pyroptosis), and RIP3 and MLKL (markers for necroptosis). The key findings are that, complete hepatocytes disintegration within an intact extracellular matrix is seen at 6 h and, new hepatocytes are seen in the treated region at 24 h, after NTIRE. There is no evidence of apoptotic cell death from NTIRE, contrary to commonly made claims in the NTIRE literature. However, molecular pathways of pyroptosis and necroptosis, programed necrosis associated with inflammation, are activated at 6 h after NTIRE and are not evident at 24 h after NTIRE. These are fundamental new findings of basic value to the field of NTIRE in all its applications. Taken together the results suggest the hypothesis that an optimal time for implantation is about 24 h after NTIRE. Future studies in which exogenous cells are implanted at different times after NTIRE are required to examine this hypothesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.04.132

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Chang, 2017, Using non-thermal irreversible electroporation to create an in vivo niche for exogenous cell engraftment, Biotechniques, 62, 229, 10.2144/000114547 · DOI
  2. Weaver, 1996, Theory of electroporation: a review, Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg., 41, 135, 10.1016/S0302-4598(96)05062-3 · DOI
  3. Neumann, 1982, Gene transfer into mouse lymphoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields, EMBO J., 1, 841, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01257.x · DOI
  4. Davalos, 2005, Tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation, Ann. Biomed. Eng., 33, 223, 10.1007/s10439-005-8981-8 · DOI
  5. Vogel, 2016, Time-dependent impact of irreversible electroporation on pancreas, liver, blood vessels and nerves: a systematic review of experimental studies, PLoS One, 11, 10.1371/journal.pone.0166987 · DOI
  6. Martin, 2016, Irreversible electroporation in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a call for standardization of energy delivery, J. Surg. Oncol., 114, 865, 10.1002/jso.24404 · DOI
  7. Rubinsky, 2007, Irreversible electroporation: a new ablation modality–clinical implications, Technol. Canc. Res. Treat., 6, 37, 10.1177/153303460700600106 · DOI
  8. Lee, 2007, Imaging guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation: ultrasound and immunohistological correlation, Technol. Canc. Res. Treat., 6, 287, 10.1177/153303460700600404 · DOI
  9. VanHook, 2014, Avoiding inflammation during apoptosis, Sci. Sig., 7
  10. Shi, 2015, Cleavage of GSDMD by inflammatory caspases determines pyroptotic cell death, Nature, 526, 660, 10.1038/nature15514 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Brennan, 2000, Salmonella induces macrophage death by caspase-1-dependent necrosis, Mol. Microbiol., 38, 31, 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02103.x · DOI
  12. Moriwaki, 2013, RIP3: a molecular switch for necrosis and inflammation, Genes Dev., 27, 1640, 10.1101/gad.223321.113 · DOI
  13. Sun, 2012, Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein mediates necrosis signaling downstream of RIP3 kinase, Cell, 148, 213, 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.031 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Phillips, 2015, Combining electrolysis and electroporation for tissue ablation, Technol. Canc. Res. Treat., 14, 395, 10.1177/1533034614560102 · DOI
  15. Phillips, 2010, Nonthermal irreversible electroporation for tissue decellularization, J. Biomech. Eng., 132, 10.1115/1.4001882 · DOI
  16. Malhi, 2006, Apoptosis and necrosis in the liver: a tale of two deaths?, Hepatology, 43, 10.1002/hep.21062 · DOI
  17. Cookson, 2001, Pro-inflammatory programmed cell death, Trends Microbiol., 9, 113, 10.1016/S0966-842X(00)01936-3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Y., Lyu, C., Liu, Y., Lv, Y., Chang, T. T., & Rubinsky, B.
Affiliations
  • Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University (CN)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Capital Medical University (CN)
  • Chongqing University (CN)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Yanfang
Venue
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
500
Issue
3
Pages
665-670
ISSN
0006-291X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2800058750
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH
  • NIBIB (R21-EB02413)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
liver, hepatocyte death, pyroptosis, necroptosis, apoptosis, caspase-3, caspase-1, gasdermin D, RIPK3, MLKL, hepatocyte regeneration, extracellular matrix
MeSH terms
Animals, Collagen, Liver, Temperature, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Electroporation, Caspases, In Situ Nick-End Labeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review