Comparative genomics of the gut commensal Bifidobacterium bifidum reveals adaptation to carbohydrate utilization
Abstract
Bifidobacterium bifidum is one of the most abundant members of the gut microbiota at the early stage of life. The established association of the bacterium with the human gut confers health benefits. Such successful persistence of B. bifidum necessitates metabolic adaptation to the host-derived carbohydrates, a process which is poorly understood. The current study focuses on revealing the genomic-based phylogeny (phylogenomics) of B. bifidum and utilizing comparative genomics to decipher the glycolytic abilities of bifidobacterial strains isolated from different human body niches (feces, human gut, vagina, and breast milk). When the phylogenomic analysis was performed on 95 B. bifidum strains, currently available on the RefSeq database, the bacterium was clearly distinguished from other members of the Bifidobacterium genus. Furthermore, a pairwise genomic comparison indicated that a large proportion of orthologous gene families were shared among the B. bifidum strains. These findings highlight the notion that the B. bifidum species is genetically similar and may perform similar functions in their host. When 15 B. bifidum genomes representing strains from different human body niches were annotated, the resulting functional profile showed the presence of enriched proteins involved in carbohydrate utilization. Moreover, mining the 15 B. bifidum genomes for the presence of Carbohydrate-Active Enzyme (CAZY) systems, the analysis found the existence of diverse protein families which include glycosyl hydrolases, glycosyl transferases, carbohydrate-binding modules, and carbohydrate esterases. Collectively, these CAZY systems enables B. bifidum to utilize host-derived glycans (e.g., mucin) and diet-derived carbohydrates (e.g., starch). In contrast, a correlation analysis revealed that B. bifidum strains isolated from the different body niches were indistinguishable in the context of presence-absence of CAZY systems. These findings emphasize the valuable use of comparative genomics in deciphering the glycolytic abilities of B. bifidum and consequently its adaptation to carbohydrate utilization in the human gut environment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The genomic diversity of B. bifidum has not yet been comprehensively surveyed, and current reference collections capture only a fraction of the global B. bifidum pangenome.
“Despite its relevance in early life, the species' genomic diversity has not yet been comprehensively surveyed, and current reference collections capture only a fraction of the global B. bifidum pangenome.”
From Genome-scale insights into the metabolic landscape and evolutionary development of Bifidobacterium bifidum (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Within a subset of 15 strains representing distinct human body niches, the carbohydrate-active enzyme repertoire varied consistently with isolation site, pointing to niche-specific metabolic adaptation.
“Within a subset of 15 strains representing distinct human body niches, such as gut, vagina, and breast milk, the carbohydrateactive enzyme repertoire varied consistently with isolation site, pointing to niche-specific metabolic adaptation.”
From Genome-scale insights into the metabolic landscape and evolutionary development of Bifidobacterium bifidum (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
An early phylogenomic survey of 95 B. bifidum strains confirmed that the species forms a genetically coherent group, clearly distinguishable from other Bifidobacterium taxa and sharing a large proportion of orthologous gene families.
“An early phylogenomic survey of 95 B. bifidum strains confirmed that the species forms a genetically coherent group, clearly distinguishable from other Bifidobacterium taxa and sharing a large proportion of orthologous gene families [29] .”
From Genome-scale insights into the metabolic landscape and evolutionary development of Bifidobacterium bifidum (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Previous comparative genomics studies of B. bifidum, limited to smaller datasets of cultured isolates from Westernized populations, consistently reported an open pangenome structure.
“Previous comparative genomics studies of this species, limited to smaller datasets of cultured isolates from Westernized populations, consistently reported an open pangenome structure [29-32] .”
From Genome-scale insights into the metabolic landscape and evolutionary development of Bifidobacterium bifidum (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Previous studies of B. bifidum and other HBS have focused more on descriptive aspects.
“adds to the results of previous studies, which have focused more on descriptive aspects in B. bifidum [29,104] and other HBS [105-107]”
From Genome-scale insights into the metabolic landscape and evolutionary development of Bifidobacterium bifidum (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- Abdelhamid, A. G., & El-Dougdoug, N. K.
- Affiliations
- Benha University (EG)
- Corresponding author
- Abdelhamid, Ahmed G.
- ORCID
- Abdelhamid, Ahmed G.
- Venue
- Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 547
- Pages
- 155-161
- ISSN
- 0006-291X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3129731465
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Keywords
- Bifidobacterium bifidum, gut commensal bacteria, carbohydrate utilization, phylogenomics, comparative genomics, carbohydrate-active enzymes, glycoside hydrolases, glycosyltransferases, carbohydrate-binding module, carbohydrate esterases, mucin degradation, starch degradation, human gut microbiome
- MeSH terms
- Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Adaptation, Physiological, Dietary Carbohydrates, Humans, Phylogeny, Genome, Bacterial, Computational Biology, Genomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review