Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Exosomal microRNA-1 and MYO15A as a target for therapy and diagnosis in renal cell carcinoma

Yoshino, Hirofumi, Tatarano, Shuichi, Tamai, Motoki, Tsuruda, Masafumi, Iizasa, Sayaka, Arima, Junya, Kawakami, Issei, Fukumoto, Wataru, Kawahara, Ichiro, Li, Gang, Sakaguchi, Takashi, Inoguchi, Satoru, Yamada, Yasutoshi, Enokida, Hideki·2022·Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.09.056

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Fig. 1 Exosome isolation using the spin column method. (A) Schema of the method for isolation of exosomes from cell culture medium or human serum. (B, C) Identi fi cation of exosomes from cell culture medium or human serum by immunoblotting (left) and NTA (right).
Fig. 1 Exosome isolation using the spin column method. (A) Schema of the method for isolation of exosomes from cell culture medium or human serum. (B, C) Identi fi cation of exosomes from cell culture medium or human serum by immunoblotting (left) and NTA (right).CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Fig. 2 Exosomal miR-1 reduced viabilities of treated cells. (A) Schema of the method used to isolate exosomes from donor cells transfected by miR-1 , followed by the transfer of exosomal miR-1 to recipient cells. (B) Fluorescence images of 786-o and A498 cells treated with PKH26-stained exosomes. (C) miR-1 expression was investigated by RT-qPCR in recipient RCC cells following the addition of miR-1 -transfected cell-derived exosomes (upper), and in RCC cells in which miR-1 was induced by a normal transfection method (lower). (D) Cell proliferation was evaluated using XTT assays (n ¼ 6). * , P < 0.05. (E) Cell migration activity was measured using wound healing assays (n ¼ 9). * , P < 0.001. (F) Cell invasion activity was measured using Matrigel invasion assays (n ¼ 8). * , P < 0.01.
Fig. 2 Exosomal miR-1 reduced viabilities of treated cells. (A) Schema of the method used to isolate exosomes from donor cells transfected by miR-1 , followed by the transfer of exosomal miR-1 to recipient cells. (B) Fluorescence images of 786-o and A498 cells treated with PKH26-stained exosomes. (C) miR-1 expression was investigated by RT-qPCR in recipient RCC cells following the addition of miR-1 -transfected cell-derived exosomes (upper), and in RCC cells in which miR-1 was induced by a normal transfection method (lower). (D) Cell proliferation was evaluated using XTT assays (n ¼ 6). * , P < 0.05. (E) Cell migration activity was measured using wound healing assays (n ¼ 9). * , P < 0.001. (F) Cell invasion activity was measured using Matrigel invasion assays (n ¼ 8). * , P < 0.01.CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Fig. 3 Analysis of miR-1 and MYO15A in TCGA kidney clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) datasets, and of MYO15A in serum exosomal RNA. (A, C upper) The expression level of miR-1 (A) and MYO15A (C) in ccRCC tissues and in normal kidney tissues according to TCGA data. (A, C lower) Overall survival of patients with high or low expression of miR-1 (A) and MYO15A (C) in ccRCC by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. P-values were calculated using the log-rank test. (B) Exosomal MYO15A mRNA expression in clinical RCC samples compared with that in clinical normal samples (upper), with & pT1b and S pT2a (lower).
Fig. 3 Analysis of miR-1 and MYO15A in TCGA kidney clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) datasets, and of MYO15A in serum exosomal RNA. (A, C upper) The expression level of miR-1 (A) and MYO15A (C) in ccRCC tissues and in normal kidney tissues according to TCGA data. (A, C lower) Overall survival of patients with high or low expression of miR-1 (A) and MYO15A (C) in ccRCC by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. P-values were calculated using the log-rank test. (B) Exosomal MYO15A mRNA expression in clinical RCC samples compared with that in clinical normal samples (upper), with & pT1b and S pT2a (lower).CC-BY-NC · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Rathmell, 2022, Management of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: ASCO guideline, J. Clin. Oncol., 10.1200/JCO.22.00868 · DOI
  2. Valadi, 2007, Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells, Nat. Cell Biol., 9, 654, 10.1038/ncb1596 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Tsuruda, 2020, Oncogenic effects of RAB27B through exosome independent function in renal cell carcinoma including sunitinib-resistant, PLoS One, 15, 10.1371/journal.pone.0232545 · DOI
  4. Kawakami, 2012, vol. 48, 827
  5. Yoshino, 2011, The tumour-suppressive function of miR-1 and miR-133a targeting TAGLN2 in bladder cancer, Br. J. Cancer, 104, 808, 10.1038/bjc.2011.23 · DOI
  6. Gerlinger, 2012, Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing, N. Engl. J. Med., 366, 883, 10.1056/NEJMoa1113205 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Aceto, 2014, Circulating tumor cell clusters are oligoclonal precursors of breast cancer metastasis, Cell, 158, 1110, 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.013 · DOI
  8. Christensen, 2017, Liquid biopsy analysis of FGFR3 and PIK3CA hotspot mutations for disease surveillance in bladder cancer, Eur. Urol., 71, 961, 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.016 · DOI
  9. Alix-Panabières, 2016, Clinical applications of circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA as liquid biopsy, Cancer Discov., 6, 479, 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1483 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Piao, 2021, Role of exosomal miRNA in bladder cancer: a promising liquid biopsy biomarker, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22, 10.3390/ijms22041713 · DOI
  11. Soares Martins, 2018, Exosome isolation from distinct biofluids using precipitation and column-based approaches, PLoS One, 13, 10.1371/journal.pone.0198820 · DOI
  12. Ayala-Mar, 2019, Recent advances and challenges in the recovery and purification of cellular exosomes, Electrophoresis, 40, 3036, 10.1002/elps.201800526 · DOI
  13. Sidhom, 2020, A review of exosomal isolation methods: is size exclusion chromatography the best option?, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21, 10.3390/ijms21186466 · DOI
  14. Enderle, 2015, Characterization of RNA from exosomes and other extracellular vesicles isolated by a novel spin column-based method, PLoS One, 10, 10.1371/journal.pone.0136133 · DOI
  15. Chen, 2016, Effects of genetic correction on the differentiation of hair cell-like cells from iPSCs with MYO15A mutation, Cell Death Differ., 23, 1347, 10.1038/cdd.2016.16 · DOI
  16. Thind, 2016, Exosomal miRNAs as cancer biomarkers and therapeutic targets, J. Extracell. Vesicles, 5
  17. Mathieu, 2019, Specificities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication, Nat. Cell Biol., 21, 9, 10.1038/s41556-018-0250-9 · DOI
  18. Wang, 2019, CD103-positive CSC exosome promotes EMT of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: role of remote MiR-19b-3p, Mol. Cancer, 18, 86, 10.1186/s12943-019-0997-z · DOI
  19. Liu, 2022, Tumor-associated macrophage-derived exosomes transmitting miR-193a-5p promote the progression of renal cell carcinoma via TIMP2-dependent vasculogenic mimicry, Cell Death Dis., 13, 382, 10.1038/s41419-022-04814-9 · DOI
  20. Lou, 2015, Exosomes derived from miR-122-modified adipose tissue-derived MSCs increase chemosensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma, J. Hematol. Oncol., 8, 122, 10.1186/s13045-015-0220-7 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Yoshino, H., Tatarano, S., Tamai, M., Tsuruda, M., Iizasa, S., Arima, J., Kawakami, I., Fukumoto, W., Kawahara, I., Li, G., Sakaguchi, T., Inoguchi, S., Yamada, Y., & Enokida, H.
Venue
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
630
Pages
71-76
ISSN
0006-291X
Cited by
24
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • Kagoshima University
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21K09404, 21K09430, 22K09452, 22K09507, 22K16792, 22K16820)
  • Takeda Science Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exosomal microRNA-1 and MYO15A as a target for therapy and diagnosis in renal cell carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.09.056
The paper
Yoshino, H., Tatarano, S., Tamai, M., Tsuruda, M., Iizasa, S., Arima, J., Kawakami, I., Fukumoto, W., Kawahara, I., Li, G., Sakaguchi, T., Inoguchi, S., Yamada, Y., & Enokida, H. (2022). Exosomal microRNA-1 and MYO15A as a target for therapy and diagnosis in renal cell carcinoma. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.09.056