Cited by 8Chemical Synthesis and AnalysisComputational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and Dynamics

Main methods and tools for peptide development based on protein-protein interactions (PPIs)

Open access
Baeza, Javiera, Bedoya, Mauricio, Cruz, Pablo, Ojeda, Paola, Adasme-Carreño, Francisco, Cerda, Oscar, González, Wendy·2025·Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) regulate essential physiological and pathological processes. Due to their large and shallow binding surfaces, PPIs are often considered challenging drug targets for small molecules. Peptides offer a viable alternative, as they can bind these targets, acting as regulators or mimicking interaction partners. This review focuses on competitive peptides, a class of orthosteric modulators that disrupt PPI formation. We provide a concise yet comprehensive overview of recent advancements in in-silico peptide design, highlighting computational strategies that have improved the efficiency and accuracy of PPI-targeting peptides. Additionally, we examine cutting-edge experimental methods for evaluating PPI-based peptides. By exploring the interplay between computational design and experimental validation, this review presents a structured framework for developing effective peptide therapeutics targeting PPIs in various diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbrc.2025.151623

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Baeza, J., Bedoya, M., Cruz, P., Ojeda, P., Adasme-Carreño, F., Cerda, O., & González, W.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Talca (CL)
  • Catholic University of the Maule (CL)
  • Millennium Nucleus of Ion Channel Associated Diseases (CL)
  • Universidad San Sebastián (CL)
Corresponding author
  • Bedoya, Mauricio
  • Cerda, Oscar
  • González, Wendy
Venue
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-04
Volume
758
Pages
151623
ISSN
0006-291X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408482958
Cited by
8
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico
  • National Agency for Research and Development (SIA 2021 SA772100091, 21210923, 1240633, 11220738, 1230446)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, peptide therapeutics, computational peptide design, in silico peptide design
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Peptides, Protein Binding, Proteins, Drug Design, Protein Interaction Mapping, Protein Interaction Maps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review