Main methods and tools for peptide development based on protein-protein interactions (PPIs)
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) regulate essential physiological and pathological processes. Due to their large and shallow binding surfaces, PPIs are often considered challenging drug targets for small molecules. Peptides offer a viable alternative, as they can bind these targets, acting as regulators or mimicking interaction partners. This review focuses on competitive peptides, a class of orthosteric modulators that disrupt PPI formation. We provide a concise yet comprehensive overview of recent advancements in in-silico peptide design, highlighting computational strategies that have improved the efficiency and accuracy of PPI-targeting peptides. Additionally, we examine cutting-edge experimental methods for evaluating PPI-based peptides. By exploring the interplay between computational design and experimental validation, this review presents a structured framework for developing effective peptide therapeutics targeting PPIs in various diseases.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · see citing works
Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Marso, S. P., Bain, S. C., Consoli, A., Eliaschewitz, F. G., Jódar, E., Leiter, L. A., Lingvay, I., Rosenstock, J., Seufert, J., Warren, M. L., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1607141 · Cited by 6,900 · see citing works
Lu, H., Zhou, Q., He, J., Jiang, Z., Peng, C., Tong, R., & Shi, J. (2020) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-020-00315-3 · Cited by 891 · see citing works
Massively parallel de novo protein design for targeted therapeutics
Chevalier, A., Silva, D.-A., Rocklin, G. J., Hicks, D. R., Vergara, R., Murapa, P., Bernard, S. M., Zhang, L., Lam, K.-H., Yao, G., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23912 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Chen, S., Lin, T., Basu, R., Ritchey, J., Wang, S., Luo, Y., Li, X., Pei, D., Kara, L. B., & Cheng, X. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45766-2 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
General approach to the synthesis of short .alpha.-helical peptides
Jackson, D. Y., King, D. S., Chmielewski, J., Singh, S., & Schultz, P. G. (1991) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00024a067 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence for Drug Discovery: Are We There Yet?
Hasselgren, C., & Oprea, T. I. (2024) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-040323-040828 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Liao, H., Li, X., Zhao, L., Wang, Y., Wang, X., Wu, Y., Zhou, X., Fu, W., Liu, L., Hu, H.-G., et al. (2020) · Cell Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41421-020-0171-1 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Rational Engineering of Enzyme Allosteric Regulation through Sequence Evolution Analysis
Yang, J.-S., Seo, S. W., Jang, S., Jung, G. Y., & Kim, S. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002612 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Baeza, J., Bedoya, M., Cruz, P., Ojeda, P., Adasme-Carreño, F., Cerda, O., & González, W.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Talca (CL)
- Catholic University of the Maule (CL)
- Millennium Nucleus of Ion Channel Associated Diseases (CL)
- Universidad San Sebastián (CL)
- Corresponding author
- Bedoya, Mauricio
- Cerda, Oscar
- González, Wendy
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-04
- Volume
- 758
- Pages
- 151623
- ISSN
- 0006-291X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4408482958
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 0.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (publishedVersion)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico
- National Agency for Research and Development (SIA 2021 SA772100091, 21210923, 1240633, 11220738, 1230446)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- protein-protein interaction, peptide therapeutics, computational peptide design, in silico peptide design
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Peptides, Protein Binding, Proteins, Drug Design, Protein Interaction Mapping, Protein Interaction Maps
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review