Cited by 43Iron Metabolism and DisordersErythropoietin and Anemia TreatmentFerroptosis and cancer prognosis

Serum hepcidin but not prohepcidin may be an effective marker for anemia of inflammation (AI)

Sasu, Barbra J., Li, Hongyan, Rose, Mark J., Arvedson, Tara L., Doellgast, George, Molineux, Graham·2010·Blood Cells Molecules and Diseases

Abstract

Anemia in cancer patients can result from a complex interaction of numerous factors including iron deficiency, inflammation, toxicity related to therapy and effect of cancer on the marrow. Determining effective anemia treatment can therefore be complex, requiring a combination of diagnostic tests. Research on iron metabolism has highlighted the importance of hepcidin and its potential role in development of anemia of inflammation (AI). Hepcidin is a peptide that controls iron flow, is induced by inflammation and is speculated to cause the sequestration of iron in patients with inflammation. In the present study, serum hepcidin concentration determined by LC-MS/MS was shown to correlate with inflammatory markers in patients with anemia of cancer (AoC). In the absence of a widely-available serum hepcidin detection assay, detection of prohepcidin using a commercial assay has been used for several years as a surrogate for measuring serum hepcidin concentration. Analysis of prohepcidin concentration did not reveal any correlation with hepcidin or with inflammatory markers in patient samples and our data suggest that prohepcidin may not be stable in serum. Algorithms to sub-classify AoC patients showed that hepcidin was strongly associated with the population subset with inflammation and without iron deficiency. Serum hepcidin concentrations may therefore be a good predictor of AI, useful in diagnosis of anemia etiology and in treatment determination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bcmd.2010.07.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 43

Authors
Sasu, B. J., Li, H., Rose, M. J., Arvedson, T. L., Doellgast, G., & Molineux, G.
Affiliations
Amgen (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Sasu, Barbra J.
Venue
Blood Cells Molecules and Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
238-245
ISSN
1079-9796 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046635824
Cited by
43
References
48
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Blood Cells Molecules and Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
Keywords
hepcidin, prohepcidin, anemia of chronic disease, cancer-related anemia, serum biomarkers, iron metabolism, inflammation, iron deficiency, inflammatory markers
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Anemia, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Iron, Male, Neoplasms, Protein Precursors, Biomarkers, Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides, Hepcidins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review