Cited by 251Mitochondrial Function and PathologyRedox biology and oxidative stressCancer and biochemical research

Intracellular generation of reactive oxygen species by mitochondria

Nohl, Hans, Gille, Lars, Staniek, Katrin·2005·Biochemical Pharmacology

Abstract

Mitochondria have bioenergetic properties that strongly suggest their involvement in the cellular formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Apparent confirmation of this process has come from work with isolated mitochondria, which have been shown to produce H(2)O(2) from dismutating superoxide radicals. Two different sites were reported to shuttle single electrons to oxygen out of the normal respiratory sequence. However, the mechanisms for ROS formation at these two sites are controversial. Arguments against mitochondrial ROS formation in the living cell are based on the fact that bioenergetic alterations may result from the mechanical removal of mitochondria from their natural environment. Furthermore, the invasive detection methods that are generally used may be inappropriate because of the possible interaction of the detection system with mitochondrial constituents. The use of non-invasive detection methods has proved that ROS formation does not occur unless changes in the physical state of the membrane are established. The aim of this commentary is to discuss critically the arguments in favor of mitochondria as the main intracellular source of ROS. The pros and cons of working with isolated mitochondria, as well as the detection methodology are carefully analyzed to judge whether or not the above assumption is correct. The conclusion that mitochondria are the main ROS generators in the cell contradicts the fact that ROS release was not observed. However, if electron flow from ubiquinol to the bc(1) complex is hindered due to changes in lipid fluidity, single electrons may transfer to dioxygen and produce H(2)O(2) via superoxide radicals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.12.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 251

Authors
Nohl, H., Gille, L., & Staniek, K.
Affiliations
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Nohl, Hans
Venue
Biochemical Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-03
Volume
69
Issue
5
Pages
719-723
ISSN
0006-2952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993742623
Cited by
251
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Austrian Science Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer and biochemical research
Keywords
reactive oxygen species, mitochondria, mitochondrial ROS generation, superoxide dismutase, hydrogen peroxide, isolated mitochondria, membrane fluidity, bc1 complex, ubiquinol, electron transfer to oxygen, mitochondrial membrane
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Hydrogen Peroxide, Mitochondria, Reactive Oxygen Species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review