nAChR agonist-induced cognition enhancement: Integration of cognitive and neuronal mechanisms
Open accessAbstract
The identification and characterization of drugs for the treatment of cognitive disorders has been hampered by the absence of comprehensive hypotheses. Such hypotheses consist of (a) a precisely defined cognitive operation that fundamentally underlies a range of cognitive abilities and capacities and, if impaired, contributes to the manifestation of diverse cognitive symptoms; (b) defined neuronal mechanisms proposed to mediate the cognitive operation of interest; (c) evidence indicating that the putative cognition enhancer facilitates these neuronal mechanisms; (d) and evidence indicating that the cognition enhancer facilitates cognitive performance by modulating these underlying neuronal mechanisms. The evidence on the neuronal and attentional effects of nAChR agonists, specifically agonists selective for alpha4beta2* nAChRs, has begun to support such a hypothesis. nAChR agonists facilitate the detection of signals by augmenting the transient increases in prefrontal cholinergic activity that are necessary for a signal to gain control over behavior in attentional contexts. The prefrontal microcircuitry mediating these effects include alpha4beta2* nAChRs situated on the terminals of thalamic inputs and the glutamatergic stimulation of cholinergic terminals via ionotropic glutamate receptors. Collectively, this evidence forms the basis for hypothesis-guided development and characterization of cognition enhancers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Demonstration of large and clinically useful effects of nicotine has been difficult.
“However, the demonstration of large and clinically useful effects of nicotine has been difficult (for review see Rusted et al, 2000; Newhouse et al, 2001, 2004; Sarter et al, 2009b; Sarter, 2010).”
From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as Sarter et al, 2009b
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 134 · Cited by 123
- Authors
- Sarter, M., Parikh, V., & Howe, W. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sarter, Martin
- Venue
- Biochemical Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 658-667
- ISSN
- 0006-2952 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2750036
- OpenAlex
- W2052873092
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 134
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 1.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Biochemical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH080332, R21MH080426, MH080426, MH 080332)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32DA007267)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Keywords
- nicotinic agonists, alpha4beta2 nAChR, cognitive enhancement, attention, thalamic input, ionotropic glutamate receptors, cognitive disorders
- MeSH terms
- Acetylcholine, Animals, Attention, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Nerve Net, Neurons, Receptors, Nicotinic, Thalamus, Prefrontal Cortex, Receptors, Glutamate, Glutamic Acid, Nicotinic Agonists
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review