Cited by 22Smoking Behavior and CessationNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Exploring behavioral and molecular mechanisms of nicotine reward in adolescent mice

Open access
Kota, Dena, Sanjakdar, Sarah, Marks, Michael J., Khabour, Omar, Alzoubi, Karem, Damaj, M. Imad·2011·Biochemical Pharmacology

Abstract

Tobacco smoking during adolescence has become a prominent preventable health problem faced in the United States. Addictive properties of smoking are thought to have a pronounced effect at a young age, thereby increasing vulnerability to a life-long addiction and decreasing the likelihood of smoking cessation during adulthood. Learning and memory involvement in nicotine reward was assessed in early adolescent (PND 28–34) and adult (PND 70+) male ICR mice by conducting conditioning sessions of nicotine (0.5 mg/kg) acquisition at varying time-spans, and evaluating extinction and reinstatement of nicotine preference using Conditioned Place Preference. Acquisition studies resulted in a significant preference for nicotine after 3 days of conditioning for both age groups, but not after only 1 or 2 conditioning days. In the extinction study, adolescent mice exhibited preference for nicotine 72 h after the last conditioning session, whereas preference for nicotine was extinct in adult mice by 72 h. Reinstatement studies showed adolescent mice, but not adult mice, recovering nicotine preference after a priming injection of 0.1 mg/kg nicotine on day 9 after the mice underwent extinction. No significant differences were found when nAChRs were quantified in both early adolescent and adult mice using binding techniques including cytisine sensitive, α-conotoxin-MII sensitive, and α-bungarotoxin sensitive nAChRs. Levels of striatal dopamine release were measured in both age groups using a dopamine release assay over a range of nicotine doses, which also resulted in no significant differences. More sensitive assays may facilitate in understanding the mechanisms of nicotine reward in adolescent mice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.06.019

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across the seven CPP studies, increased CPP was found in adolescent-exposed rats and mice as compared to adult-exposed and their relative age-matched controls when tested the following day after conditioning.

    “Across the seven studies, increased CPP was found in adolescent-exposed rats and mice as compared to adult-exposed and their relative age-matched controls when tested the following day after conditioning”

    From Age-dependent Effects of Tobacco Smoke and Nicotine on Cognition and the Brain: A Systematic Review of the Human and Animal Literature Comparing Adolescents and Adults. (2023) · cites this paper as Kota et al., 2011

    Results §3.1 reports that adolescent mice showed nicotine CPP at lower doses than adults, supporting an age-related difference in mice. But this paper does not report results across seven studies or in rats. Results §3.2 says that, when tested the following day after three conditioning sessions at 0.5 mg/kg, both age groups showed CPP and its intensity did not differ between them; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These findings suggest adolescent rodents may retain nicotine-paired cues and contextual signs for a longer period than adults, resulting in the risk of increased nicotine-seeking.

    “These findings suggest adolescent rodents may retain nicotine-paired cues and contextual signs for a longer period than adults, resulting in the risk of increased nicotine-seeking”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 22

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [38]Chen J Millar WT Age of smoking initiation: implications for quitting. Health Rep 1998 9 39 46 9836879

Authors
Kota, D., Sanjakdar, S., Marks, M. J., Khabour, O., Alzoubi, K., & Damaj, M. I.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO)
Corresponding author
Damaj, M. Imad
Venue
Biochemical Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
82
Issue
8
Pages
1008-1014
ISSN
0006-2952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072040192
Cited by
22
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biochemical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA012610, DA-12610)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
nicotine reward, adolescent smoking, nicotine preference, conditioned place preference, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, striatal dopamine release
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Brain, Cell Membrane, Conditioning, Operant, Dopamine, Exploratory Behavior, Male, Mice, Inbred ICR, Nicotine, Protein Binding, Receptors, Nicotinic, Reward, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review