CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesComposting and Vermicomposting Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anaerobic digestion of chicken manure coupled with ammonia recovery by vacuum-assisted gas-permeable membrane process

Chen, Benchi, Shao, Yusen, Shi, Mingfei, Ji, Long, He, Qingyao, Yan, Shuiping·2021·Biochemical Engineering Journal
DOI 10.1016/j.bej.2021.108135
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bej.2021.108135

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Deng, 2017, Application and development of biogas technology for the treatment of waste in China, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 70, 845, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.265 · DOI
  2. Li, 2016, Mass balances and distributions of C, N, and P in the anaerobic digestion of different substrates and relationships between products and substrates, Chem. Eng. J., 287, 329, 10.1016/j.cej.2015.11.003 · DOI
  3. Burg, 2018, Valorization of an untapped resource: energy and greenhouse gas emissions benefits of converting manure to biogas through anaerobic digestion, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 136, 53, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.004 · DOI
  4. Wolf, 2014, Contribution of N2O and NH3 to total greenhouse gas emission from fertilization: results from a sandy soil fertilized with nitrate and biogas digestate with and without nitrification inhibitor, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst., 100, 121, 10.1007/s10705-014-9631-z · DOI
  5. Monlau, 2015, New opportunities for agricultural digestate valorization: current situation and perspectives, Energy Environ. Sci., 8, 2600, 10.1039/C5EE01633A · DOI
  6. Ulusoy, 2021, Energy and emission benefits of chicken manure biogas production: a case study, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28, 12351, 10.1007/s11356-018-3466-0 · DOI
  7. Chen, 2018, Influence of clay as additive on greenhouse gases emission and maturity evaluation during chicken manure composting, Bioresour. Technol., 266, 82, 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.073 · DOI
  8. Li, 2018, Removal of nitrogen from chicken manure anaerobic digestion for enhanced biomethanization, Fuel, 232, 395, 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.142 · DOI
  9. Li, 2011, Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 15, 821, 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.042 · DOI
  10. Chen, 2008, Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review, Bioresour. Technol., 99, 4044, 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057 · DOI
  11. Yuan, 2016, Progress in inhibition mechanisms and process control of intermediates and by-products in sewage sludge anaerobic digestion, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 58, 429, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.261 · DOI
  12. Wang, 2018, Improving exploitation of chicken manure via two-stage anaerobic digestion with an intermediate membrane contactor to extract ammonia, Bioresour. Technol., 268, 811, 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.027 · DOI
  13. Bayrakdar, 2018, Anaerobic digestion of chicken manure by a leach-bed process coupled with side-stream membrane ammonia separation, Bioresour. Technol., 258, 41, 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.117 · DOI
  14. He, 2020, Developing a vacuum-assisted gas-permeable membrane process for rapid ammonia recovery and CO2 capture from biogas slurry, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 8, 154, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04873 · DOI
  15. He, 2019, B.E.E.F: a sustainable process concerning negative CO2 emission and profit increase of anaerobic digestion, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 7, 2276, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b04963 · DOI
  16. Robles, 2020, New frontiers from removal to recycling of nitrogen and phosphorus from wastewater in the circular economy, Bioresour. Technol., 300, 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122673 · DOI
  17. Montalvo, 2020, Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus recovery from liquid swine wastes: a review, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 95, 2335, 10.1002/jctb.6336 · DOI
  18. Yao, 2017, Simultaneous ammonia stripping and anaerobic digestion for efficient thermophilic conversion of dairy manure at high solids concentration, Energy, 141, 179, 10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.086 · DOI
  19. Zhao, 2015, Ammonia recovery from anaerobic digester effluent through direct aeration, Chem. Eng. J., 279, 31, 10.1016/j.cej.2015.04.113 · DOI
  20. Serna-Maza, 2015, Biogas stripping of ammonia from fresh digestate from a food waste digester, Bioresour. Technol., 190, 66, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.041 · DOI
  21. Zhang, 2012, Ammonia stripping for enhanced biomethanization of piggery wastewater, J. Hazard. Mater., 199, 36
  22. Provolo, 2017, Nitrogen removal from digested slurries using a simplified ammonia stripping technique, Waste Manag., 69, 154, 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.047 · DOI
  23. Bonmatı́, 2003, Air stripping of ammonia from pig slurry: characterisation and feasibility as a pre- or post-treatment to mesophilic anaerobic digestion, Waste Manage, 261, 10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00144-7 · DOI
  24. Walker, 2011, Ammonia removal in anaerobic digestion by biogas stripping: an evaluation of process alternatives using a first order rate model based on experimental findings, Chem. Eng. J., 178, 138, 10.1016/j.cej.2011.10.027 · DOI
  25. Ukwuani, 2016, Developing a vacuum thermal stripping – acid absorption process for ammonia recovery from anaerobic digester effluent, Water Res., 106, 108, 10.1016/j.watres.2016.09.054 · DOI
  26. Tao, 2015, Coupling thermal stripping and acid absorption for ammonia recovery from dairy manure: ammonia volatilization kinetics and effects of temperature, pH and dissolved solids content, Chem. Eng. J., 280, 188, 10.1016/j.cej.2015.05.119 · DOI
  27. Darestani, 2017, Hollow fibre membrane contactors for ammonia recovery: current status and future developments, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 5, 1349, 10.1016/j.jece.2017.02.016 · DOI
  28. Bayrakdar, 2017, Dry anaerobic digestion of chicken manure coupled with membrane separation of ammonia, Bioresour. Technol., 244, 816, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.047 · DOI
  29. Zhang, 2017, Continuous operation of thermophilic food waste digestion with side-stream ammonia stripping, Bioresour. Technol., 244, 611, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.180 · DOI
  30. Dalkılıc, 2015, Biogas production from chicken manure at different organic loading rates in a mesophilic-thermopilic two stage anaerobic system, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 120, 315, 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2015.01.021 · DOI
  31. Aramrueang, 2016, Effects of hydraulic retention time and organic loading rate on performance and stability of anaerobic digestion of Spirulina platensis, Biosyst. Eng., 147, 174, 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.04.006 · DOI
  32. Li, 2013, Comparison of methane production potential, biodegradability, and kinetics of different organic substrates, Bioresour. Technol., 149, 565, 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.063 · DOI
  33. Drosg, 2015, Nutrient recovery by biogas digestate processing, IEA Bioenergy
  34. Verbeeck, 2018, Upgrading the value of anaerobic digestion via chemical production from grid injected biomethane, Energy Environ. Sci., 11, 1788, 10.1039/C8EE01059E · DOI
  35. Lin, 2016, Economic and environmental evaluation of nitrogen removal and recovery methods from wastewater, Bioresour. Technol., 215, 227, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.064 · DOI
  36. Shi, 2020, Techno-economic evaluation of ammonia recovery from biogas slurry by vacuum membrane distillation without pH adjustment, J. Clean. Prod., 265, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121806 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chen, B., Shao, Y., Shi, M., Ji, L., He, Q., & Yan, S.
Affiliations
Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • He, Qingyao
  • Yan, Shuiping
ORCID
Venue
Biochemical Engineering Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
175
Pages
108135
ISSN
1369-703X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.bej.2021.108135
OpenAlex
W3177554122
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Biochemical Engineering Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32002222)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2020CFA107, 2020CFB209)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Keywords
anaerobic digestion, chicken manure, ammonia removal, ammonia inhibition, biogas yield, methane production, ammonia recovery, economic evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review