CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorMusic and Audio ProcessingMarine animal studies overview

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A method for identifying sounds used in the classification of alarm calls

Placer, J, Slobodchikoff, C.N·2004·Behavioural Processes
DOI 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.03.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this study, we present a methodology that identifies acoustic units in Gunnison's prairie dog alarm calls and then uses those units to classify the alarm calls and bouts according to the species of predator that was present when the calls were vocalized. While traditional methods measure specific acoustic parameters in order to describe a vocalization, our method uses the variation in the internal structure of a vocalization to define possible information structures. Using a simple representation similar to that used in human speech to identify vowel sounds, a software system was developed that uses this representation to recognize acoustic units in prairie dog alarm calls. These acoustic units are then used to classify alarm calls and their associated bouts according to the species of predator that was present when the alarm calls were vocalized. Identification of bouts with up to 100% accuracy was obtained. This work represents a first step toward revealing the details of how information is encoded in a complex nonhuman communication system. Furthermore, the techniques discussed in this paper are not restricted to a database of prairie dog alarm calls. They could be applied to any animal whose vocalizations include multiple simultaneous frequencies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.03.001

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kiriazis, J., 1991. Communication and Sociality in Gunnisons prairie dogs, PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
  2. Lengagne, 1997, Une methode de decomposition temporelle et spectrale des signaux bioacoustiques: reconnaissance individuelle chez quatre especes de manchots. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences, Serie III, Sciences de la Vie, 320, 885
  3. Owings, D.H., Hennessy, D.F., 1984. The importance of variation in sciurid visual and vocal communication. in: Murie, J.O., Michener, G.R. (Eds.), The Biology of Ground-Dwelling Squirrels. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NB, pp. 167–200.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 19

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Placer, J., & Slobodchikoff, C. N.
Affiliations
Northern Arizona University (US)
Venue
Behavioural Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-07
Volume
67
Issue
1
Pages
87-98
ISSN
0376-6357 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.beproc.2004.03.001
OpenAlex
W2066298494
Cited by
19
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Behavioural Processes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
Gunnison's prairie dog, alarm calls, animal communication, predator detection
MeSH terms
Acoustics, Animals, Auditory Perception, Echolocation, Sound, Sound Spectrography, Vocalization, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review