Cited by 33Behavioral and Psychological StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Interresponse times and the structure of choice

Davison, Michael·2004·Behavioural Processes

Abstract

This paper presents some analyses of available data on interresponse-time emission on concurrent variable-interval schedules arranged either continuously or as discrete components, and in which either reinforcer rates or magnitudes were varied. Ratios of frequencies of interresponse times in a series of temporal bins varied in their sensitivity to reinforcement: Sensitivity values were least for interresponse times around 0.2-0.4s, were higher in the region 0-0.2s, and were highest at values greater than 0.4s. Relative frequencies of interresponse times were greatest around 0.2-1.6s. As a result, time allocation to alternatives were mainly determined by IRTs between 0.8 and 6.4s, and least by IRTs less than 0.8s. If inter-bout times reflect time allocation to unmeasured responses, then time spent emitting unmeasured behavior may be the main constituent of time allocation on concurrent schedules. An analysis of log survivor plots supported this suggestion, and further suggested that a full understanding of time allocation in choice requires accepting that unmeasured responses do not result from a unitary process, but from many disparate contributing processes. These other behaviors can be revealed through Gaussian log-normal analyses of interresponse-time distributions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.03.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Behavior generally represents some combination of effects due to reinforcers and intrinsic response-by-response patterning of behavior.

    “Although it is conceptually useful to separate the effects of reinforcers and the potentially intrinsic response-by-response patterning of behavior (e.g., tendencies to generate particular sequences of behavior), behavior generally represents some combination of these two (Davison, 2004; Heyman, 1979; Palya, 1992).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 33

Authors
Davison, M.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Davison, Michael
Venue
Behavioural Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-06
Volume
66
Issue
3
Pages
173-187
ISSN
0376-6357 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051452371
Cited by
33
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Processes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
interresponse time, concurrent schedules, variable-interval schedules, time allocation, reinforcement sensitivity
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Choice Behavior, Models, Psychological, Columbidae, Reaction Time, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review