Interresponse times and the structure of choice
Abstract
This paper presents some analyses of available data on interresponse-time emission on concurrent variable-interval schedules arranged either continuously or as discrete components, and in which either reinforcer rates or magnitudes were varied. Ratios of frequencies of interresponse times in a series of temporal bins varied in their sensitivity to reinforcement: Sensitivity values were least for interresponse times around 0.2-0.4s, were higher in the region 0-0.2s, and were highest at values greater than 0.4s. Relative frequencies of interresponse times were greatest around 0.2-1.6s. As a result, time allocation to alternatives were mainly determined by IRTs between 0.8 and 6.4s, and least by IRTs less than 0.8s. If inter-bout times reflect time allocation to unmeasured responses, then time spent emitting unmeasured behavior may be the main constituent of time allocation on concurrent schedules. An analysis of log survivor plots supported this suggestion, and further suggested that a full understanding of time allocation in choice requires accepting that unmeasured responses do not result from a unitary process, but from many disparate contributing processes. These other behaviors can be revealed through Gaussian log-normal analyses of interresponse-time distributions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Behavior generally represents some combination of effects due to reinforcers and intrinsic response-by-response patterning of behavior.
“Although it is conceptually useful to separate the effects of reinforcers and the potentially intrinsic response-by-response patterning of behavior (e.g., tendencies to generate particular sequences of behavior), behavior generally represents some combination of these two (Davison, 2004; Heyman, 1979; Palya, 1992).”
From DYNAMIC RESPONSE-BY-RESPONSE MODELS OF MATCHING BEHAVIOR IN RHESUS MONKEYS (2005) · cites this paper as Davison, 2004
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- Davison, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Davison, Michael
- ORCID
- Davison, Michael
- Venue
- Behavioural Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 173-187
- ISSN
- 0376-6357 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051452371
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural Processes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- interresponse time, concurrent schedules, variable-interval schedules, time allocation, reinforcement sensitivity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Choice Behavior, Models, Psychological, Columbidae, Reaction Time, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review