Socio-ecological factors correlate with levels of stereotypic behavior in zoo-housed primates
Abstract
Stereotypic behavior often indicates poor welfare. It may develop when the animal's ability to carry out appropriate behavioral responses is limited, despite a high motivation to express them. Behavioral motivations vary across species. Consequently, under similar captive conditions, the sustained inability of animals to express certain behaviors is likely to affect some species more than others. We used a phylogenetic comparative approach to evaluate the socio-ecological factors affecting the manifestation of stereotypic behavior in 24 species of zoo-housed primates. We examined the relationship between two stereotypic behaviors: hair-pulling and pacing, and the species' natural socio-ecological factors and captivity conditions. The degree of stereotypic behaviors was unaffected by phylogenetic relatedness between species. Stereotypic hair-pulling behavior levels were positively correlated with natural group size. Stereotypic pacing levels were positively correlated with the animals' natural day journey length. These findings suggest large-group and wide-ranging primate species are more prone to suffer in captivity. Our findings facilitate the detection of species that are more susceptible to behaving stereotypically in captivity. We suggest that providing appropriate social stimuli, and increasing the complexity of the captive environment rather than enlarging it, are both attainable and expected to improve the animals' welfare.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The natural, sociobiological characteristics of elephants predict the welfare challenges summarized above.
“Moreover, the natural, sociobiological characteristics of elephants (e.g., the need for space, cognitive and social complexity, and dietary practices) predict the welfare challenges summarized above (Clubb & Mason, 2007;Miller, Andrews & Anderson, 2012;Pomerantz, Meir & Terkel, 2013;Hosey, Melfi & Ward, 2020;Mellor et al., 2021”
From Continuing challenges of elephant captivity: the captive environment, health issues, and welfare implications (2024) · cites this paper as Pomerantz, Meir & Terkel, 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 73 · Cited by 52
- Authors
- Pomerantz, O., Meiri, S., & Terkel, J.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Pomerantz, Ori
- Venue
- Behavioural Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 98
- Pages
- 85-91
- ISSN
- 0376-6357 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012540605
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Behavioural Processes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- stereotypy, zoo-housed primates, animal welfare, hair pulling, pacing, group size, socio-ecological factors, phylogenetic comparative analysis, social stimuli, environmental enrichment
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare, Animals, Zoo, Housing, Animal, Phylogeny, Primates, Species Specificity, Stereotyped Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review