The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Open accessAbstract
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is most commonly due to degenerative changes in older individuals. LSS is being more commonly diagnosed and may relate to better access to advanced imaging and to an aging population. This review focuses on radicular symptoms related to degenerative central and lateral stenosis and updates knowledge of LSS pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Since patients with anatomic LSS can range from asymptomatic to severely disabled, the clinical diagnosis focuses on symptoms and examination findings associated with LSS. Imaging findings are helpful for patients with persistent, bothersome symptoms in whom invasive treatments are being considered. There is limited information from high quality studies about the relative benefits and harms of commonly used treatments. Interpreting and comparing results of available research is limited by a lack of consensus about the definition of LSS. Nevertheless, evidence supports decompressive laminectomy for patients with persistent and bothersome symptoms. Recommendations favor a shared decision making approach due to important trade-offs between alternative therapies and differences among patients in their preferences and values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chapter 4 European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain
Airaksinen, O., Brox, J. I., Cedraschi, C., Hildebrandt, J., Klaber-Moffett, J., Kovacs, F., Mannion, A. F., Reis, S., Staal, J. B., Ursin, H., et al. (2006) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1 · Cited by 2,594
Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis
Weinstein, J. N., Tosteson, T. D., Lurie, J. D., Tosteson, A. N. A., Blood, E., Hanscom, B., Herkowitz, H., Cammisa, F., Albert, T., Boden, S. D., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0707136 · Cited by 1,229
Chou, R., Loeser, J. D., Owens, D. K., Rosenquist, R. W., Atlas, S. J., Baisden, J., Carragee, E. J., Grabois, M., Murphy, D. R., Resnick, D. K., et al. (2009) · Spine · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e3181a1390d · Cited by 581 · cited 2×
“Because patients with LSS may have potentially unrealistic expectations about the risks and benefits of surgery,(90) it is recommended that decisions regarding surgery for LSS should be based on a shared decision making approach.(91) Shared decision making involves providing patients with the knowledge needed to make…”
BackgroundSelf-citationChou, R., Atlas, S. J., Stanos, S. P., & Rosenquist, R. W. (2009) · Spine · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e3181a103b1 · Cited by 392
Self-citationThe Efficiency of Gabapentin Therapy in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Yaksi, A., Özgönenel, L., & Özgönenel, B. (2007) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000261029.29170.e6 · Cited by 118
Cited by
Diagnosis and Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Review
Katz, J. N., Zimmerman, Z. E., Mass, H., & Makhni, M. C. (2022) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2022.5921 · Cited by 562
Metadata
- Authors
- Genevay, S., & Atlas, S. J.
- Venue
- Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 253-265
- ISSN
- 1521-6942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056526677
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.