Cited by 62Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The influence of thought suppression and cognitive load on intrusions and memory processes following an analogue stressor

Nixon, Reginald D.V., Cain, Neralie, Nehmy, Thomas, Seymour, Melanie·2009·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Ironic Process Theory and the role of thought suppression have been used in part to explain the phenomenon of intrusive memories in various disorders, including posttraumatic stress disorder. How thought suppression interacts with other cognitive processes believed to be instrumental in the development of traumatic intrusive memory is unclear. In an analogue study, thought suppression and cognitive processing was manipulated in 4 experimental groups after participants (n=80) viewed a trauma film. The impact of suppression was examined in relation to self-reported intrusive experiences as well as via more objective methods (word stem and dot probe tasks) to assess potential preferential encoding of negative material. Cognitive load appeared to undermine thought suppression ability, with these participants experiencing more intrusions over the week relative to participants in all other conditions. This group also showed greater priming to negative film-related words, and both suppression groups demonstrated enhanced memory for film-related content on recognition testing. Thought suppression mediated the relationship between negative interpretations of initial intrusions and later intrusions experienced over the week. The findings are discussed in the context of ironic process theory and cognitive models of posttraumatic stress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 62

Authors
Nixon, R. D. V., Cain, N., Nehmy, T., & Seymour, M.
Affiliations
Flinders University (AU)
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
368-379
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074941357
Cited by
62
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
thought suppression, cognitive load, intrusive memories, ironic process theory, post-traumatic stress disorder, trauma film, memory encoding, recognition memory
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Repression, Psychology, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Video Recording, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review