Cited by 91Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Efficacy of a Manualized and Workbook-Driven Individual Treatment for Social Anxiety Disorder

Ledley, Deborah Roth, Heimberg, Richard G., Hope, Debra A., Hayes, Sarah A., Zaider, Talia I., Dyke, Melanie Van, Turk, Cynthia L., Kraus, Cynthia +1 more·2009·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Social anxiety disorder is a prevalent and impairing disorder for which viable cognitive-behavioral therapies exist. However, these treatments have not been easily packaged for dissemination and may be underutilized as a result. The current study reports on the findings of a randomized controlled trial of a manualized and workbook-driven individual cognitive-behavioral treatment for social anxiety disorder (Hope, Heimberg, Juster, & Turk, 2000; Hope, Heimberg, & Turk, 2006). This treatment package was derived from an empirically supported group treatment for social anxiety disorder and intended for broad dissemination, but it has not previously been subjected to empirical examination on its own. As a first step in that examination, 38 clients seeking treatment for social anxiety disorder at either the Adult Anxiety Clinic of Temple University or the Anxiety Disorders Clinic of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln were randomly assigned to receive either immediate treatment with this cognitive-behavioral treatment package or treatment delayed for 20 weeks. Evaluation at the posttreatment/postdelay period revealed substantially greater improvements among immediate treatment clients on interviewer-rated and self-report measures of social anxiety and impairment. Three-month follow-up assessment revealed maintenance of gains. Clinical implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2008.12.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 61 · Cited by 91

Authors
Ledley, D. R., Heimberg, R. G., Hope, D. A., Hayes, S. A., Zaider, T. I., Dyke, M. V., Turk, C. L., Kraus, C., & Fresco, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
414-424
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987381187
Cited by
91
References
61
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, manualized treatment, individual treatment, treatment dissemination, treatment efficacy, maintenance of treatment gains, treatment delay
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Behavior Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Severity of Illness Index, Social Behavior, Treatment Outcome, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review