Cited by 76Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Combining computerized home-based treatments for generalized anxiety disorder: an attention modification program and cognitive behavioral therapy

Open access
Amir, Nader, Taylor, Charles T.·2012·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a common and disabling condition associated with significant personal and societal costs. Although efficacious treatments exist for GAD, the majority of these individuals fail to access our most effective treatments. In the current paper, we report the results of an open trial that examined the efficacy of a computer-delivered home-based treatment program for GAD. Twenty-one individuals seeking treatment for GAD received a self-administered program over 6 weeks that comprised two components: (1) an Attention Modification Program (AMP) designed to facilitate attentional disengagement from threat-relevant stimuli and (2) brief computer-delivered cognitive and behavioral treatment modules (CCBT). Fourteen of the 21 enrolled participants (67%) completed the treatment program. Intent-to-treat and completer analyses revealed that AMP+CCBT resulted in significant reductions in clinician- and self-rated symptoms of anxiety, worry, depression, and functional impairment. Moreover, treatment completers displayed significant reductions in attentional bias for threat from pre- to postassessment. Change in attentional bias for threat from pre- to postassessment was associated with change in worry symptoms. Finally, 79% of participants no longer met DSM-IV criteria for GAD at postassessment and 36% were classified as remitted (Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety ≤7; Rickels et al., 2006). These results suggest that computer-delivered AMP+CCBT may serve as an effective and easily accessible treatment option for individuals with GAD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2010.12.008

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-CBT treatments such as mindfulness-based interventions or bias modification programs have shown some promise in reducing GAD severity but often did not enroll GAD patients with prominent depression, restore high endstate functioning, or significantly resolve depression when present.

    “non-CBT treatments such as mindfulness-based interventions consisting solely of meditative practice71–73 or bias modification programs74, 75, which may be seen as requiring less effort to deliver, have shown some promise in reducing GAD severity but often did not enroll GAD patients with prominent levels of depression72), restore patients to high endstate functioning75, 76, or significantly resolv”

    From AN OPEN TRIAL OF EMOTION REGULATION THERAPY FOR GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER AND COOCCURRING DEPRESSION. (2015) · cites this paper as [75]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There are promising indications that ABMT may be a useful add-on to CBT.

    “there are promising indications that ABMT may be a useful add-on to CBT. [23,35]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 89 · Cited by 76

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW 1994 Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I DSM-IV Disorders-Patient Edition New York Biometrics Research Department
  2. Hedlund JL Vieweg BW 1979 The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: A comprehensive review Journal of Operational Psychiatry 10 149 165
  3. Wilson GT Hayes SC Follette VM Dawes RM Grady KE 1995 Empirically-validated treatments as a basis for clinical practice: Problems and prospects Scientific methods of psychological practice: Issues and recommendations 163 196 Reno, NV Context Press

Authors
Amir, N., & Taylor, C. T.
Affiliations
San Diego State University (US)
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
546-559
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003841077
Cited by
76
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH087623, R34MH077129, R34MH073004)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, home-based therapy, attentional disengagement, cognitive behavioral therapy, worry, depression, functional disability, treatment accessibility
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Self Administration, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review