Cited by 12Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsHealth Policy Implementation ScienceAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Dissemination and Implementation of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression in the Kaiser Permanente Health Care System: Evaluation of Initial Training and Clinical Outcomes

Karlin, Bradley E., Brown, Gregory K., Jager-Hyman, Shari, Green, Kelly L., Wong, Michi, Lee, Diane S., Bertagnolli, Andrew, Ross, Thekla Brumder·2019·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Notwithstanding its empirical status and strong recommendation in clinical practice guidelines, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) continues to be delivered infrequently and with low fidelity on the clinical front lines. Recently, organized efforts and policies within the public sector to disseminate and implement CBT and other evidence-based psychotherapies have yielded encouraging results and provided optimism for bridging the research-to-practice-gap. Following from these efforts, the current article examines the initial impact and experience of the implementation of an individualized approach to CBT training and treatment within the Kaiser Permanente health care system. Initial training outcomes, including changes in general and specific competencies, were assessed using divergent assessment methods within the initial cohort of therapists undergoing training. Initial patient outcomes, including changes in depression and anxiety, were assessed among patients receiving treatment from therapists in training. Results revealed training in and implementation of CBT-D was associated with overall large improvements in therapist competencies and in clinically significant improvements in both depression and anxiety among patients. Findings from the initial phase of dissemination and implementation within a large private system provide support for, and extend recent findings related to, the feasibility and effectiveness of training in and implementation of CBT-D in a real-world context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2018.08.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 12

Authors
Karlin, B. E., Brown, G. K., Jager-Hyman, S., Green, K. L., Wong, M., Lee, D. S., Bertagnolli, A., & Ross, T. B.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
Corresponding author
Karlin, Bradley E.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
446-458
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886655526
Cited by
12
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Kaiser Permanente
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
dissemination and implementation, therapist training, therapist competence, depression, anxiety, Kaiser Permanente, evidence-based psychotherapy, research-practice gap
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Delivery of Health Care, Depression, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review