Cited by 29Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchSleep and related disorders

Bidirectional relationships between posttraumatic stress disorder and social functioning during cognitive processing therapy

Open access
Lord, Kayla A., Suvak, Michael K., Holmes, Samantha, Shields, Norman, Lane, Jeanine E.M., Sijercic, Iris, Wagner, Anne C., Stirman, Shannon Wiltsey +1 more·2020·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

This study investigated temporal relationships between posttraumatic stress symptoms and two indicators of social functioning during cognitive processing therapy. Participants were 176 patients (51.5% female, M age = 39.46 [SD = 11.51], 89.1% White, 42.6% active duty military/veteran) who participated in at least two assessment time points during a trial of cognitive processing therapy. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (PTSD Checklist for DSM-IV) and interpersonal relationship and social role functioning problems (Outcome Questionnaire-45) were assessed prior to each of 12 sessions. Multivariate multilevel lagged analyses indicated that interpersonal relationship problems predicted subsequent PTSD symptoms (b = .22, SE = 0.09, cr = 2.53, p = .01, pr = .46) and vice versa (b = .05, SE = 0.02, cr = 2.11, p = .04, pr = .16); and social role functioning problems predicted subsequent PTSD symptoms (b = .21, SE = 0.10, cr = 2.18, p = .03, pr = .16) and vice versa (b = .06, SE = 0.02, cr = 3.08, p < .001, pr = .23). Military status moderated the cross-lag from social role functioning problems to PTSD symptoms (b = -.35, t = -2.00, p = .045, pr = .16). Results suggest a robust association between PTSD symptoms and social functioning during cognitive processing therapy with a reciprocal relationship between PTSD symptoms and social functioning over time. Additionally, higher social role functioning problems for patients with military status indicate smaller reductions in PTSD symptoms from session to session.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2019.08.002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social support influences outcomes from PTSD treatment approaches such as cognitive processing therapy.

    “There is also evidence that social support (and, conversely, social problems) influences outcomes from PTSD treatment approaches, such as cognitive processing therapy [24,25].”

    From A Randomized Pilot Study of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to Improve Social Support for Veterans with PTSD (2022) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that poorer interpersonal and social-role functioning during cognitive processing therapy was associated with smaller subsequent decreases in PTSD symptoms. This supports the claim about social problems and treatment outcomes, but the study measured functioning problems, not social support itself, and its temporal associations do not establish a causal influence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 29

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lambert MJ, Morton JJ, Hatfield DR, Harmon C, Hamilton S, Shimokawa K, … Burlingame GB (2004b). Administration and scoring manual for the OQ-45.2 (Outcome Ques-tionnaire) (3rd ed.). Wilmington, DE: American Professional Credentialling Services LLC
  2. Muthén LK and Muthén BO (1998-2012). Mplus User’s Guide. Seventh Edition.

Authors
Lord, K. A., Suvak, M. K., Holmes, S., Shields, N., Lane, J. E. M., Sijercic, I., Wagner, A. C., Stirman, S. W., & Monson, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Suffolk University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Royal Canadian Mounted Police (CA)
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Lord, Kayla A.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
447-460
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2967459795
Cited by
29
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, social functioning, cognitive processing therapy, interpersonal problems, social role functioning, bidirectional relationship, military veterans, treatment response, PTSD symptom change
MeSH terms
Social Interaction, Adult, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review