Balance of antiperitoneal adhesion, hemostasis, and operability of compressed bilayer ultrapure alginate sponges
Open accessAbstract
In surgery, both antiperitoneal adhesion barriers and hemostats with high efficiency and excellent handling are necessary. However, antiadhesion and hemostasis have been examined separately. In this study, six different ultrapure alginate bilayer sponges with thicknesses of 10, 50, 100, 200, 300, and 500 μm were fabricated via lyophilization and subsequent mechanical compression. Compression significantly enhanced mechanical strength and improved handling. Furthermore, it had a complex effect on dissolution time and contact angle. Therefore, the 100 μm compressed sponge showed the highest hemostatic activity in the liver bleeding model in mice, whereas the 200 μm sponge demonstrated the highest antiadhesion efficacy among the compressed sponges in a Pean crush hepatectomy-induced adhesion model in rats. For the first time, we systematically evaluated the effect of sponge compression on foldability, fluid absorption, mechanical strength, hemostatic effect, and antiadhesion properties. The optimum thickness of an alginate bilayer sponge by compression balances antiperitoneal adhesion and hemostasis simultaneously.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Alginate-based hydrogels have been investigated for their potential to prevent post-surgical adhesions by creating a temporary physical barrier that separates injured tissues during healing.
“In the context of anti-adhesion barriers, alginate-based hydrogels have been investigated for their potential to prevent post-surgical adhesions by creating a temporary physical barrier that separates injured tissues during the healing process [172,173].”
From Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering (2025) · cites this paper as [172]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering
Fazel Anvari-Yazdi, A., Badea, I., & Chen, X. (2025) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels11060441 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Singh Chandel, A. K., Ohta, S., Taniguchi, M., Yoshida, H., Tanaka, D., Omichi, K., Shimizu, A., Isaji, M., Hasegawa, K., & Ito, T.
- Affiliations
- Center for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine, The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Mochida Pharmaceutical (Japan) (JP)
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Ito, Taichi
- Venue
- Biomaterials Advances
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 137
- Pages
- 212825
- ISSN
- 2772-9508 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4225117034
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 333 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Biomaterials Advances (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (20H02530, 21H05092)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hemostasis and retained surgical items
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
- Keywords
- anti-adhesion barrier, hemostasis, compression, mechanical strength, fluid absorption, contact angle, liver bleeding, peritoneal adhesions, freeze-drying
- MeSH terms
- Tissue Adhesions, Alginates, Animals, Bandages, Hemostasis, Hemostatics, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review