Cited by 390Ecosystem dynamics and resilienceEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesLand Use and Ecosystem Services

The concept and utility of ‘ecological thresholds’ in biodiversity conservation

Open access
Huggett, Andrew J.·2005·Biological Conservation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.037

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huggett, A. J.
Affiliations
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Huggett, Andrew J.
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
124
Issue
3
Pages
301-310
ISSN
0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014990349
Cited by
390
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 10
FWCI
13.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Funders
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
  • University of New England
  • Ecological Society of Australia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
ecological thresholds, tipping points, biodiversity conservation, natural resource management, habitat loss, habitat fragmentation, threatened species, conservation policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review