Land-cover change and human population trends in the greater Serengeti ecosystem from 1984–2003
Open accessAbstract
The growth of human populations around protected areas accelerates land conversion and isolation, negatively impacting biodiversity and ecosystem function, and can be exacerbated by immigration. It is often assumed that immigration around protected areas is driven by attraction in the form of economic benefits, but in many cases, people may be pushed from their areas of origin toward protected areas. Mitigating the effects of immigration around protected areas necessitates understanding the actual mechanisms causing it, which can be aided by analysis of patterns of land-cover change. Our goal was to identify the reasons for human population growth and land-cover change around the protected areas in the greater Serengeti ecosystem (henceforth âthe parkâ), and to relate agricultural conversion from 1984â2003 to trends in human demography. We found that conversion of natural habitats to agriculture was greatest closer to the park (up to 2.3% per year), coinciding with the highest rates of human population growth (3.5% per year). Agricultural conversion and population growth were greatest where there was less existing agriculture, and population density was lowest. Lack of unfarmed land farther from the park, coupled with greater poverty near the park, suggest that movement away from areas with high population densities and land scarcity was likely driving immigration near the park, where arable land was available. Our results are essential for conservation planning for one of Africaâs hallmark ecosystems, and should encourage further examination of population growth and land-cover trends near protected areas throughout the developing world.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies suggest that both the rate of land-use change and the growth of human populations can be fastest near protected area boundaries.
“Previous studies suggest that both the rate of landuse change and the growth of human populations can be fastest near protected area boundaries ( 13 -16 ), which accelerate the rate of edge degradation through increased livestock production, crop cultivation, and extraction of natural resources such as charcoal and bushmeat.”
From Cross-boundary human impacts compromise the Serengeti-Mara ecosystem (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 140
- Authors
- Estes, A. B., Kuemmerle, T., Kushnir, H., Radeloff, V. C., & Shugart, H. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Estes, Anna Bond
- Venue
- Biological Conservation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 255-263
- ISSN
- 0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061709525
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 8.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 336 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Biological Conservation (acceptedVersion)
- Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
- Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
- European Commission (FP7-ENV-2010-265104, NAG-11084, NNX-07-A063G, NNX-07-AF10G)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Keywords
- land cover change, human population growth, protected areas, immigration, agricultural land conversion, habitat loss, poverty, land scarcity, conservation planning, human demography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review