Ponds as insect chimneys: Restoring overgrown farmland ponds benefits birds through elevated productivity of emerging aquatic insects
Abstract
Farmland bird populations have experienced severe declines across Europe and elsewhere. Agricultural intensification is believed to be a main factor behind these declines, with losses of non-cropped features, such as farmland ponds, identified as a key driver. Since the 1950s, many European farmland ponds have been in-filled or, through lack of management, become terrestrialised. Restoring terrestrialised farmland ponds has been shown to significantly increase the abundance and diversity of local farmland bird communities. It has been hypothesised that farmland birds are specifically attracted to open-canopy ponds due to increased emergent aquatic insect availability, but this link has hitherto been little explored.This study investigates how farmland pond management influences emergent aquatic insects, and how emergent insect abundance and biomass is linked to local bird assemblages. Insect emergences showed an 18-fold higher abundance and a 25-fold higher biomass at managed open-canopy ponds in comparison to their unmanaged overgrown counterparts, with day-to-day fluctuations in pond water temperature a key predictor of insect emergences. Species richness and abundance of birds at farmland ponds were strongly positively linked to the abundance of emergent insects. Furthermore, insect emergence peaks occurred on different days in different restored ponds such that the pond landscape afforded extended feeding opportunities for birds. Our findings suggest that restoring networ…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many terrestrial species, including insect pollinators, birds, bats, and other mammals, rely on ponds for water, food, and habitat.
“Alongside aquatic species, many terrestrial species, including insect pollinators, birds, bats, and other mammals rely on ponds for water, food, and habitat (Nummi et al. 2011, Lewis-Phillips et al. 2020).”
From Pond ecology and conservation: research priorities and knowledge gaps (2021) · cites this paper as Lewis-Phillips et al. 2020
Cites
More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas
Hallmann, C. A., Sorg, M., Jongejans, E., Siepel, H., Hofland, N., Schwan, H., Stenmans, W., Müller, A., Sumser, H., Hörren, T., et al. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0185809 · Cited by 3,499 · see citing works
Pond biodiversity and habitat loss in the UK
Wood, P. J., Greenwood, M. T., & Agnew, M. D. (2003) · Area · doi:10.1111/1475-4762.00249 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
The role of pond management for biodiversity conservation in an agricultural landscape
Sayer, C., Andrews, K., Shilland, E., Edmonds, N., Edmonds‐Brown, R., Patmore, I., Emson, D., & Axmacher, J. (2012) · Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/aqc.2254 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pond ecology and conservation: research priorities and knowledge gaps
Hill, M. J., Greaves, H. M., Sayer, C. D., Hassall, C., Milin, M., Milner, V. S., Marazzi, L., Hall, R., Harper, L. R., Thornhill, I., et al. (2021) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.3853 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
“There is a growing recognition of the importance of interactions between ponds and terrestrial species, especially farmland birds (Lewis-Phillips et al. 2020) and insect pollinators (Stewart et al. 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMaking an impact on UK farmland pond conservation
Sayer, C. D., & Greaves, H. M. (2020) · Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/aqc.3375 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationLaw, A., Baker, A., Sayer, C. D., Foster, G., Gunn, I. D. M., Macadam, C. R., & Willby, N. J. (2024) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-024-01992-z · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Lewis-Phillips, J., Brooks, S. J., Sayer, C. D., Patmore, I. R., Hilton, G. M., Harrison, A., Robson, H., & Axmacher, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Natural History Museum (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lewis-Phillips, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biological Conservation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 241
- Pages
- 108253
- ISSN
- 0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2989726510
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- NERC London Doctorial Training Programme (NE/L002485/1)
- Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
- Keywords
- farm ponds, pond restoration, farmland birds, emergent aquatic insects, insect emergence, insect biomass, bird foraging behavior, agricultural intensification, pond management, water temperature, aquatic plants, agri-environmental schemes, bird population decline
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review