Cited by 83Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

Assessing biological invasions in protected areas after 30 years: Revisiting nature reserves targeted by the 1980s SCOPE programme

Open access
Shackleton, Ross T., Foxcroft, Llewellyn C., Pyšek, Petr, Wood, Louisa E., Richardson, David M.·2020·Biological Conservation

Abstract

Invasive alien species pose a major threat to biodiversity and natural ecosystems globally and negatively affect conservation efforts in protected areas. They can negatively alter biodiversity and ecological regimes and are a financial burden. Because of their negative impacts, it is important to better understand the threat and management of invasive alien species in protected areas (PAs) globally, and to know how these factors have changed over time. We give an update and compare how the threat and management of invasive species has changed in 21 PAs that were analysed as part of the international SCOPE programme on biological invasions in the mid-1980s. Of all the taxa analysed, invasive plants pose the greatest continued threat, and their numbers have increased in 31% of the PAs. Conversely, mammal invasions now represent less of a threat due to effective management in many PAs; 43% of PAs show a decrease in listed invasive alien mammal taxa. Invasions of amphibians, reptiles, and fish have remained stable over the three decades; around half of the PAs show no change for these taxa. Managers of most PAs consider the threat of invasions to be increasing, despite many (55%) PAs having sustained long-term management programmes and 45% having implemented additional ad hoc approaches. We draw on lessons from this analysis to support the future management of biological invasions in conservation areas. In particular, better monitoring and collation of data is needed, followed by increased preventative measures and the promotion of biological control for widespread species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108424

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extent and overall impact of invasive species in protected areas is increasing worldwide, especially for invasive plants, despite some notable successes in dealing with such invasions.

    “The extent and overall impact of invasive species in protected areas is increasing worldwide, especially for invasive plants, despite some notable successes in dealing with such invasions (Shackleton et al., 2020).”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Shackleton et al., 2020

    The Discussion (section 4; page unavailable) says invasions appear to be worsening in many protected areas, especially for plants, while noting substantial management successes for invasive mammals. The assessment covers 21 protected areas, and section 3.1.4 measures perceived threat rather than a worldwide increase in overall impact; those broader parts of the claim are not established. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In some cases, trends in biological invasions have been reversed following implementation of control efforts.

    “These trends have sometimes been reversed following the implementation of control efforts (Simberloff et al., 2011, 2018; Shackleton et al., 2020)”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Shackleton et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. te Beest, M., Howison, O., Howison, R.A., Dew, L.A., Poswa, M.M., Dumalisile, L., Janse van Rensburg, S., Ter Blanche, C., 2017. Successful Control of the Invasive Shrub Chromolaena odorata in Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park. Conserving Africa's Mega-Diversity in the Anthropocene: The Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park Story. Cambridge University Press, pp. 358.
  2. Clout, M.N., Veitch, C.R., 2002. Turning the Tide of Biological Invasion: The Potential for Eradicating Invasive Species. Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species. IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge.
  3. DeLoach, C.J., Moran, P.J., Knutson, A.E., Thompson, D.C., Carruthers, R.I., Michels, J., Herr, J.C., Muegge, M., Eberts, D., Randal, C., Everitt, J., 2007. Beginning success of biological control of saltcedars (Tamarix spp.) in the southwestern USA. In: XII International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. France, La Grande Motte, pp. 22-27.
  4. Essl, F., Dullinger, S., Rabitsch, W., Hulme, P.E., Hülber, K., Jarošík, V., Kleinbauer, I., Krausmann, F., Kühn, I., Nentwig, W., Vilà, M., 2011. Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 203-207.
  5. Foxcroft, L.C., 2001. A case study of human dimensions in invasion and control of alien plants in the personnel villages of Kruger National Park. In: McNeely, J.A. (Ed.), The Great Reshuffling: Human Dimensions of Invasive Alien Species. IUCN, Gland, and Cambridge, pp. 127-134.
  6. Foxcroft, L.C., Pyšek, P., Richardson, D.M., Genovesi, P., 2013a. Plant invasions in pro- tected areas: outlining the issues and creating the links. In: Foxcroft, L.C., Pyšek, P., Richardson, D.M., Genovesi, P. (Eds.), Plant Invasions in Protected Areas: Patterns, Problems and Challenges. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 19-41.
  7. Foxcroft, L.C., Pyšek, P., Richardson, D.M., Pergl, J., Hulme, P.E., 2013b. The bottom line: impacts of alien plant invasions in protected areas. In: Foxcroft, L.C., Pyšek, P., Richardson, D.M., Genovesi, P. (Eds.), Plant Invasions in Protected Areas: Patterns, Problems and Challenges. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 19-41.
  8. Gardener, M.R., Trueman, M., Buddenhagen, C., Heleno, R., Jäger, H., Atkinson, R., Tye, A., 2013. A pragmatic approach to the management of plant invasions in Galápagos. In: Foxcroft, L.C., Pyšek, P., Richardson, D.M., Genovesi, P. (Eds.), Plant Invasions in Protected Areas: Patterns, Problems and Challenges. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 349-374.
  9. Loope, L.L., Hughes, R.F., Meyer, J., 2013. Plant invasions in protected areas of tropical Pacific Islands, with special reference to Hawaii. In: Foxcroft, L.C., Pyšek, P., Richardson, D.M., Genovesi, P. (Eds.), Plant Invasions in Protected Areas: Patterns, Problems and Challenges. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 313-348.
  10. Mačić, V., et al., 2018. Biological invasions in conservation planning: a global systematic review. Front. Mar. Sci. 5, 178.
  11. Meyer, J., Loope, L., Goarant, A., 2011. Strategy to control the invasive alien tree Miconia calvescens in Pacific islands: eradication, containment or something else? In: Veitch, C.R., Clout, M.N., Towns, D.R. (Eds.), Island Invasives: Eradication and Management. IUCN, Gland, pp. 91-96.
  12. Mooney, H.A., Mack, R.N., McNeely, J.A., Neville, L.E., Schei, P.J., Waage, J.K. (Eds.), 2005. Invasive Alien Species: A New Synthesis. Island Press, London SCOPE 63.
  13. Morin, L., Neave, M., Batchelor, K., Reid, A., 2006. Biological control: a promising tool for managing bridal creeper, Asparagus asparagoides (L.) Druce, in Australia. Plant Protection Quarterly 21, 69-77.
  14. Pyšek, P., Blackburn, T.M., García-Berthou, E., Perglová, I., Rabitsch, W., 2017. Displacement and local extinction of native and endemic species. In: Vilà, M., Hulme, P.E. (Eds.), Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services. Springer, Berlin, pp. 157-175.
  15. Richardson, D.M. (Ed.), 2011. Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
  16. Richardson, D.M. (Ed.), Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK, pp. 11-24.
  17. Wenner, A.M., Thorp, R.W., Barthell, J.F., 2009. Biological control and eradication of feral honey bee colonies on Santa Cruz Island, California: a summary. In: Proceedings of the 7th California Islands Symposium, pp. 327-335.
  18. Witt, A.B., Kiambi, S., Beale, T., van Wilgen, B.W., 2017. A preliminary assessment of the extent and potential impacts of alien plant invasions in the Serengeti-Mara eco- system, East Africa. Koedoe 59, a1426. https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v59i1.1426. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shackleton, R. T., Foxcroft, L. C., Pyšek, P., Wood, L. E., & Richardson, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • South African National Parks (ZA)
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
  • Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Shackleton, Ross T.
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
243
Pages
108424
ISSN
0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3007936173
Cited by
83
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universiteit Stellenbosch
  • National Research Foundation (85417)
  • DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
  • South African National Parks
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (RVO 67985939)
  • Czech Science Foundation (19-28807X)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
biological invasions, invasive species, protected areas, invasive plants, invasive mammals, invasive amphibians, invasive reptiles, invasive fish, invasive species management, long-term monitoring, biological control, conservation threats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review